SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18940 133 0
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16007Congratulations Mark! Through intrepid use of the AIM 2001 Notes, you've manOldAIMGuy-5/23/2001
16006Hi Mark, Again thank you for preparing the Day Two report. Great job. I quit pOldAIMGuy-5/23/2001
16005Hi, Bernie. What a pleasure meeting you in person. I enjoyed your talk and havRFH-5/23/2001
16004<<what a bummer. i just know bob's girls are missing me to no end. theRFH-5/23/2001
16003Hi Mark, thxs for the notes. I'm especially interested in MPT since I'm LemonHead-5/22/2001
16002Thanks Tom, I had seen that chart but forgotten about it. It sure is nice when ywhitelake-5/22/2001
16001More AIM 2001 Day 2 presentations... Tom Veale's Perverse Investment Candidaptus-5/22/2001
16000More notes from Day 2 of the AIM 2001 Conference in Las Vegas. My presentation aptus-5/22/2001
15999Hello Everyone, here are the notes from Day 2 of the AIM 2001 conference in Las aptus-5/22/2001
15998Hello Keith and Bud, Tom had some interesting comments on UOPIX at AIM 2001. Iaptus-5/22/2001
15997Hi John, QQQ is volatile enough to be treated as a regular individual stock. I&#OldAIMGuy-5/22/2001
15996Hi Bud, Actually, I made my own investment in QQQ this year. It was probably goiOldAIMGuy-5/22/2001
15995Hi Tom, Your mention of QQQ sparks a question. I hope to AIM mine if it will getwhitelake-5/22/2001
15994Bernie or anyone interested.....I have expressed my opinions before of future prbudweeder-5/22/2001
15993Hi Tom; Thanks for your comments on UOPIX. I know you are managing a group accbudweeder-5/22/2001
15992Hi Bernie; Thanks for the response......I have RYVYX in two separate accounts, budweeder-5/22/2001
15991Man, I was wondering how you climbed the ladder so quick. <ggg>. Thought mLemonHead-5/22/2001
15990Hi Bud, Until I think of something more clever, I plan on selling UOPIX above ouOldAIMGuy-5/22/2001
15989At what price coach? My sell order is in at 10.31 and I can't count that higdoniam-5/22/2001
15988Hi Don, Just put in a "Deep Diver" limit order for the next sell on VNLemonHead-5/22/2001
15987Hi Bud, As you have read in my posts, I no longer consider index funds that are Bernie Goldberg-5/22/2001
15986scott, my social directions skills have been gleaned from many years of social asteve in socal-5/22/2001
15985Hi Bud, Don't pay any attention to me. UOPIX is a beast!!! Much to complicatLemonHead-5/22/2001
15984Hi Bernie; I have surmised that at some point you intend to move in a major waybudweeder-5/22/2001
15983Hi Keith; Gosh, I just realized I am getting somewhat grizzled in using AIM...lbudweeder-5/22/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News