SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
U S FILTER (USF) A Water Stock !
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
361 3 0 USF
Emcee:  Andrew Spurlin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
161 First things first -- what's keeping the stock price down? -3% earnings suCharles Martin-11/14/1997
160 I understand. Well earnings are growing pretty quick so you can't help but robert duke-11/13/1997
159 Wow, I did not realize what could happen. So how big if this mistake actualy harobert duke-11/13/1997
158 Actually my comment was not directed at you; sorry. There are others who keep tSteve Childs-11/13/1997
157 My friend, I am surprised that you are so shocked. The amount of inefficienciesdouglas scott goldstein-11/13/1997
156 Well I agree with you. I don't think that two different offer really happenrobert duke-11/13/1997
155 This company will need to begin acquiring a lot more if they plan to stay on torobert duke-11/13/1997
154 Why would you buy if you believe they are so discombobulated as to make two comGary Leger-11/13/1997
153 It's what the earnings will be in 2010 that count. There is projected to bedavid bell-11/12/1997
152 I never said 35%-50%, I said around 25%. And, as so far as buying anything righdouglas scott goldstein-11/12/1997
151 Is the stock that low already? Well I was in at 41 by a mistake. Well I should robert duke-11/12/1997
150 Well I think it is because earnings are still growing rather quickly. It may norobert duke-11/12/1997
149 Why does everyone keep saying USF has a LTG rate of 35-50%? It's 20-25%. I&Steve Childs-11/11/1997
148 I was as surprised as you were- I'm serious though, a close friend is an andouglas scott goldstein-11/11/1997
147 So what do you think is the reason the stock is down the last two weeks? I picrobert duke-11/11/1997
146 I find that story hard to believe. I wasn't at the meeting but if you'rGary Leger-11/11/1997
145 It's not the potential for top-line growth that people are concerned (i.e.,douglas scott goldstein-11/10/1997
144 good company momemtum up now momentum down support at 27 to 29 that is the Susan Saline-11/10/1997
143 If this company has 1 billion in the pipe line then what is the problem with throbert duke-11/10/1997
142 Well lets look at it this way. If things slow down just a fraction that is stirobert duke-11/8/1997
141 Robert, have you thought of buying more when it is down? When it hits $30, you Steve Childs-11/6/1997
140 Yes but I purchased the stock at 41 1/16. But yes I am going to hold the stockrobert duke-11/5/1997
139 The market is that big. How big is it at this present time? Unfortunately I purobert duke-11/5/1997
138 You certainly raise some good points. Maybe USF is a bit too acquisition mindeddouglas scott goldstein-11/5/1997
137 robert, if you are in USF for the long haul, you own a great stock. Don't wSteve Childs-11/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News