LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1634	<<<No need to get emotional>>> I always get emotional when I	Don Johnstone	-	3/23/2000
1633	No need to get emotional. After all, your analysis may be more accurate than m	pat mudge	-	3/23/2000
1632	???Doesn't really give you warm-fuzzies, does it??? Neither do you and you	Don Johnstone	-	3/23/2000
1631	<< Somehow I am reading this and it says to me that delivery will occure	MangoBoy	-	3/23/2000
1630	Somehow I am reading this and it says to me that delivery will occure in July i	Dick Martin	-	3/23/2000
1629	<i>You don't seem to realize that in business money talks and Molex i	pat mudge	-	3/22/2000
1628	<<The big picture is that LUMM has a superior, cheaper product in a field	Lhn5	-	3/22/2000
1627	>>>>Under agreements with it, Molex will acquire the non-exclusive	s-words	-	3/22/2000
1626	+++Molex agreement blocks any chance of being acquired+++ You don't seem t	Don Johnstone	-	3/22/2000
1625	Interesting but long winded discussions, but I fear that you might not be seein	Herc	-	3/22/2000
1624	Pat; Well documented! One thing that has always made me chuckle was the 25% m	jjs64	-	3/22/2000
1623	Let's read the SEC filing again: >>>> As of the date hereof, o	pat mudge	-	3/22/2000
1622	<I>Based on the above agreement, Molex's right of first refusal on an	UR_In&Out	-	3/22/2000
1621	<i>What is your basis for claiming that Molex can sell the company? That	pat mudge	-	3/22/2000
1620	<i> Either you don't know Amati's history or you've forgotten	UR_In&Out	-	3/22/2000
1619	<i>My memory is hazy. Didn't Amati do the same thing?</i> Not	pat mudge	-	3/21/2000
1618	<< You're forgetting that these two intellects made the decision to g	MangoBoy	-	3/21/2000
1617	<i>In fact, both of these companies share some similar traits (although I	pat mudge	-	3/21/2000
1616	A question for Pat Mudge (or two): Now there is a name that I remember from th	UR_In&Out	-	3/21/2000
1615	Btw,Molex also bought at 23. I'll take my chances with lumm talk to me in	Mike Hardy	-	3/20/2000
1614	I did look at Sheldahl when that press release came out about the no deal with	Don Johnstone	-	3/20/2000
1613	Don't forget DJ, that MOLX has a history of investing in hype filled techno	jjs64	-	3/20/2000
1612	Why wouldn't they? They are only paying 25 cents cash a share for their sto	jjs64	-	3/20/2000
1611	<i>molex has a vested interest in the success of Lumenon</i> And w	pat mudge	-	3/20/2000
1610	Where do we vote? Oh yea, the stock market. DJ	Don Johnstone	-	3/20/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):