SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18940 133 0
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16357<i>Knowing so many good quality people who invest using the same general mLemonHead-6/22/2001
16356Hi N, Is that Einstein Bagles? I though they added Figs to Newtons. :-) TomOldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16355Thanks Nimbus. That's good advice. I'll take it under advisement. As Steve Grabczyk-6/22/2001
16354Well Tom Perhaps you are the man to add the cash component factor to Mr. L'Nimbus-6/22/2001
16353Hi N, All I have learned about AIM during the "bull" market says that OldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16352Thanks RG, As my portfolio wanders <i>AIMlessly</i> this week that aOldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16351Hi Steve, You bring up an interesting option that I've suggested to some in OldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16350I set up my 401K like you are planning. I picked the most volatile stock fund aNimbus-6/22/2001
16349Hi again Craig, I checked the link from the Newsletter and made sure it worked fOldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16348Craig, Looking for the check to arrive. At least we did make contact. SIrgammon-6/22/2001
16347Steve, As I read thru your first message, I was thinking that you were very clorgammon-6/22/2001
16346Hi Grabber, Craig beat me to answering you. AIM what's already there in one OldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16345Hi Craig and Welcome!, You took the words right out of my mouth! Thanks for coOldAIMGuy-6/22/2001
16344Tom, Tech stock woes are indeed continuing. For an alternate view, one thrgammon-6/22/2001
16343Hi Craig, and thanks. I actually was considering a Twinvest approach as well, aSteve Grabczyk-6/22/2001
16342I have not studied EW in detail, but I'm extremely skeptical given how wrongaxp-6/22/2001
16341Robert: I have been unable to contact you via email. I am finally able to log irangermorton-6/21/2001
16340Hello Steve, As an alternative you might also consider starting the AIM accountrangermorton-6/21/2001
16339Hello all: I'd like to bounce an idea off of you all if I may. At my emploSteve Grabczyk-6/21/2001
16338Hi Robert; I didn't mean to imply that I was an EW'er in fact, or practbudweeder-6/21/2001
16337Hi RG, It would appear that some of the tech stocks are being treated a bit harsOldAIMGuy-6/21/2001
16336<i>We've got 6-10 years before we have to look outside of the US markergammon-6/21/2001
16335<i>I spent some time learning the concept and reading "experts" areokat-6/21/2001
16334<i>However, Japan has alot to do before we as individuals will be able to areokat-6/21/2001
16333Hi Dave, Sounds like he died <i>FOR</i> and <i>OF</i> hiOldAIMGuy-6/21/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News