SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IDPH--Positive preliminary results for pivotal trial of ID
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1762 27 0 IDPH
Emcee:  Roudy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1637 IDPH: Upgrade to 1-Buy by Lehman: Report: lehman.com MartinJongmans-2/17/1999
1636 To all who are looking, earnings will start with a preliminary release on 1/21/Roudy-1/20/1999
1635 Thanks for the number Don, but I'll leave it to somebody else [with lower lMaurice Winn11/19/1999
1634 That would be a good question for IDEC. Sounds like it could be a good fit, butRoudy-1/19/1999
1633quote.yahoo.com Looks as though it's time for IDEC to expand their lymphomaMaurice Winn11/18/1999
1632 Don: Lehman Bros. has a target of $59. From their Dec. 14th report. Bill billkirn-12/27/1998
1631 Do we know the new target price for IDPH ? Don Cheng-12/23/1998
1630 Merrill Lynch/ 12/21/98 "Reason for report: Change of opinions InvestmeJOHN W.-12/22/1998
1629 It is there. $45, now what? Maybe $50 by this Friday which is options expiratguido leone-12/17/1998
1628 Merrill Lynch has a 12 mos. target on IDPH of 45. Almost there.Douglas Babbin-12/16/1998
1627 I thought it might pick up a little with the recent price move. Guess there is Roudy-12/15/1998
1626 This thread should is a lot quieter than it was last year. This stock has doneguido leone-12/15/1998
1625 This must be the first time following a significant conference that the stock wRoudy-12/11/1998
1624 Thanks DMB, The allergic reaction and any other adverse reactions I suppose wiMaurice Winn111/20/1998
1623 I want to thank you for taking the time to post your comments. They are very iBob L-11/16/1998
1622 Why did we tank today? Doug Meetmer-11/16/1998
1621 2 comments: 1. I had heard of a patient, at Stanford I believe, who had a veryDMB111/16/1998
1620 DMB, thanks for the explanation. Being an engineer, I far prefer mechanisms anMaurice Winn111/13/1998
1619 It is hard to extrapolate from a measurable "response rate" for a sinDMB111/13/1998
1618bloodjournal.org This says "An analysis of prognostic factors showed that Maurice Winn111/13/1998
1617 You're right; Rituxan could activate some pathway leading to programmed ceWebhead-11/1/1998
1616 Re: "I ran a quick literature search to try and find out how Rituxan actuaDMB110/30/1998
1615 Yes, that was a nice move Maurice. We also had a significant bullish breakout pRoudy-10/30/1998
1614 Ed, a lymphoma specialist at Scripps Clinic told me in February that the mechanMaurice Winn110/30/1998
1613 I ran a quick literature search to try and find out how Rituxan actually killsWebhead-10/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):