SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Wi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN)
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
16863 131 0 WILN
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16488Same Jurisdiction, two Juries given the illogical task of evaluating patent clP2V-10/24/2013
16487I find it ridiculous that a group of untrained people in a short time can make sBMWIN-10/24/2013
16486adjective: unfortunate 1. having or marked by bad fortune; unlucky.Dexter Lives On-10/24/2013
16485Who said anything about luck ?P2V-10/24/2013
16484"Unfortunately"? What does luck have to do with it?!?! The BOD and mDexter Lives On-10/24/2013
16483Unfortunately, this is second time, a group of Jurors were given the impossiblP2V-10/24/2013
16482Yes, BUT: Special attention should be given to items, which Wi-Lan indicates &quP2V-10/24/2013
16481Multicode direct sequence spread spectrum US RE37802 E1 Legal Events DatP2V-10/23/2013
16480I'd be surprised if they did not go for a retrial ... 6 other companies agreMark Bartlett-10/23/2013
16479How's that Options Reward Plan working out? Must be time soon for some new Dexter Lives On-10/23/2013
16478Another crushing court loss, and another patent bites the dust. This is not susDexter Lives On-10/23/2013
16477That looks like weak grounds for a mistrial in itself. This case is about Wi-LaRob S.-10/22/2013
16476It's all about prior art. Check out the jury instructions Prior ArtBMWIN-10/22/2013
16475The way the agreements of the IEEE and 3GPP standards groups that govern most ofRob S.-10/22/2013
16474Apple did obtain such an opinion, but the opinion was protected by attorney-cliefortuiyous1-10/22/2013
16473Apple Demands Mistrial In Wi-LAN Patent Feud By Kat Greene Law360, Los AngelesPaul Lee-10/22/2013
16472I wonder what you have read, from the trial itself. Someone has been kind enoP2V-10/20/2013
16471Since there's nothing but discussion of the upside, here's my take on thDexter Lives On-10/19/2013
16470Politics and persuasion carry more weight than facts. This is a jury trial, notDexter Lives On-10/19/2013
16469He is wrong again, about who developed the technology. The two inventors who fP2V-10/18/2013
16468The statements 1, “It’s a Wi-Fi patent,” he said. “Wi-LAN was focused on LP2V-10/18/2013
16467This is great news. The Apple litigation team must really be slipping if they keMoneyCooper-10/18/2013
16466Not only is that pessimistic, it's logically impossible. Where is the sourceMoneyCooper-10/18/2013
16465OT Looks like the market is finally awakening to the fact that Acacia is a housDexter Lives On-10/17/2013
16464Apple Can't Use FRAND Defense In Wi-LAN Trial, Judge SaysBy Erica Teichert Paul Lee-10/17/2013
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):