SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1653Might make a nice Christmas present? But -- before you print out the informatIlaine-12/7/2005
1652Wow! I wish I had an extra hundred bucks. I think I'd find out my ancestManyMoose-12/7/2005
1651I bought DNA kits through the National Geographic Genographic Project -- one forIlaine-12/7/2005
1650I just found this essay on the same subject. straightdope.com Ruesch wrote a seManyMoose-12/7/2005
1649That's the same procedure I used to no avail. I'm good with searches anManyMoose-12/7/2005
1648Searching Amazon with the title you gave brought up a lot of other stuff. So I Snowshoe-12/7/2005
1647That's the one! I don't know why I wasn't connecting on it with my ManyMoose-12/7/2005
1646Don't think I ever heard of that book, but I tracked it down via Google... Snowshoe-12/7/2005
1645I'm glad you liked that item. I posted it in part because our honorable modLane3-12/6/2005
1644 Good post. Certainly "the good old days were not always good", and TimF-12/6/2005
1643Oh, suing insurance companies is all good fun, but bringing a mass tort case agaIlaine-12/5/2005
1642I don't actually use Shepards, I use (mostly) the Virginia version of CasefiIlaine-12/5/2005
1641Want to see something sad? Here's Charlie Schwartz's decision in the SOcarranza2-12/5/2005
1640<I>I can't Shepardize Louisiana cases but here's where I'd stacarranza2-12/5/2005
1639Wha??carranza2-12/5/2005
1638Parking this case here as one that is on point - suing Army Corps of Engineers pIlaine-12/5/2005
1637It could have been there weren't enough inspectors. That's a managementManyMoose-12/5/2005
1636Well, all I am is a plaintiff's lawyer who's been suing the federal goveIlaine-12/5/2005
1635<I>If the Lord was trying to cement us with disaster, He used a heavy trocarranza2-12/5/2005
1634<I>If I had been inspecting those levee contracts, I guarantee you they wocarranza2-12/5/2005
1633"How good were the good old days? Well, I've upgraded both Movable TypLane3-12/5/2005
1632<i>hell, if you think you can summarize the discretionary function excepticarranza2-12/5/2005
1631Well, hell, if you think you can summarize the discretionary function exception Ilaine-12/5/2005
1630Gross negligence is a very tough standard under Louisiana law. I'm certainlcarranza2-12/4/2005
1629I spent many years administering forestry contracts, and we were very careful toManyMoose-12/4/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News