SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Micro Circuits Corp (AMCC)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1805 111 0 AMCC
Emcee:  Dave Grady Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1655TA, you work on-line in real-time!! See, I know the people of both companies faiTaro-10/17/2001
1654Wow Taro! Amcc over mrvl? Never thought I'd see the day you picked anothertechanalyst1-10/17/2001
1653I believe the thoughts of all you guys are basically very sound as for the ripplTaro-10/17/2001
1652Amcc is going to do fine long term. But why buy leaps when even the 10's aretechanalyst1-10/17/2001
1651Hi FR1, <i>Maybe the thing to do is to buy leaps and protect them with sRaymond Duray-10/17/2001
1650Not having second thoughts about valuation are you? The thing to do is buy stoctechanalyst1-10/17/2001
1649RD, I agree with you that there was a gold rush mentality. Personally, I agree wFR1-10/17/2001
1648Hi TA, don't worry too much about ZO, he's a master at foot in mouth synchojiro-10/17/2001
1647<anyone who has anything negative to say about valuation has to be short> BWAC-10/16/2001
1646Come on Kayaker. You know me from several boards. You know I use my hedging monetechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1645I don't think you're short. I suspect you're just not interested inKayaker-10/16/2001
1644That could be. Amcc isn't going to have a decent p/s. We went over that a ctechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1643<i>I bet there have been a good number of people buying amcc expecting a bKayaker-10/16/2001
1642Yeah. I guess so. Some people just think anyone who has anything negative to satechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1641Hi TA1, Re: <i>Imagine someone accusing ME of being short amcc!</i>Raymond Duray-10/16/2001
1640Long time no talk Ray. Imagine someone accusing ME of being short amcc! ROFLOLtechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1639No. I'm not short amcc. I didn't say a word about shorting THIS stock, dtechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1638Hi FR1, If you don't mind my jumping into the fray here, I'd have to sRaymond Duray-10/16/2001
1637<i>I want to make myself clear on AMCC:<i/> you are making it very czbyslaw owczarczyk-10/16/2001
1636I want to make myself clear on AMCC: I like the company. I like the management.techanalyst1-10/16/2001
1635What, besides AMCC, do you like? I have always been interested, for a wild stocFR1-10/16/2001
1634The Fed accelerated the process. If there were enough demand, the strong would btechanalyst1-10/16/2001
1633It will be an interesting CC. We will have to compare notes after it is over. FR1-10/16/2001
1632AMCC LEAPS available as of last (I think) week.Kayaker-10/15/2001
1631Yes, they were screaming for rates to be lowered. That should kind of say that ttechanalyst1-10/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News