SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1664 Z, You missed one key point. Of course there was no way that VRTS would have Gus-4/4/2000
1663 <<So what is Veritas worth?>> I believe this is similar to the situZ Analyzer-4/4/2000
1662 This type of positioning could explain why 'short VRTS' is becoming oneGus-4/4/2000
1661 When VRTS touched $100 this morning I was even on the small short position I toRobert Douglas-4/4/2000
1660 <<If I was to structure the deal, VRTS buys SEG and then spins off the VRZ Analyzer-4/4/2000
1659 I am still wondering why the routine sum-of-the-parts analysis of this company Gus-4/4/2000
1658 Thread, A trader friend sent me some comments on this deal that I thought I wouSam-4/3/2000
1657 Also, I suspect there were some heavily margined VRTS owners (with "were&qStruggling Investor-4/3/2000
1656 Good point, Robert. Now look at the fine mess they find themselves in. SEG caGus-4/3/2000
1655 <i>It's becoming harder to see how VRTS can come out of this deal unsRobert Douglas-4/3/2000
1654 The fascinating to watch now is how they will try even harder to sweeten the deGus-4/3/2000
1653 Robert - Sorry to see you leave. I purchased some call options today. My broMark Madden-4/3/2000
1652 Z, I am now, like you, an interested bystander. I sold the rest of my SEG thiRobert Douglas-4/3/2000
1651 Shreholder's portion of the pie versus management's getting smaller eveZ Analyzer-4/3/2000
1650 <<McNamee has stated that Silver Lake has been working this deal for two Z Analyzer-4/3/2000
1649 <i>I'll probably have to take a Zantac</i>. . . Make that a XanStarlight-4/3/2000
1648 Gus, excellent viewpoints. advaloremKevRupert-4/3/2000
1647 Luczo is a classic shyster.. unfortunately a very clever shyster. Besides beingEd Gein-4/3/2000
1646 thx, Gus, for a fantastic post.Struggling Investor-4/3/2000
1645 Some other points to consider: 1) Was SEG concerned that the size of its inveGus-4/3/2000
1644 just read that DLJ (who loves this deal for VRTS, naturally) raised the VRTS 12Struggling Investor-4/2/2000
1643 I agree completely with your comments, struggling investor. I think in an idealKevRupert-4/2/2000
1642 just mvho, but I don't think this deal has an ice cube's chance in you-Struggling Investor-4/2/2000
1641 At the end of the day, my thought is "I don't trust Seagate managementKevRupert-4/2/2000
1640 Mike - Thank you for commentary you are providing on this thread. You bring oMark Madden-4/2/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News