SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Legal proceedings via SI
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
242 15 0
Emcee:  Josef Svejk Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
167 EP, Thank you for your courtesy, it is refreshing and most welcome. And yes, Ben Antanaitis-12/16/1998
166 Thanks, KJC. I would be interested in that article. I can tell you that it isBrightFuture-12/16/1998
165 But possible <g> Cheeky Kid-12/16/1998
164 Cheeky, Too absurd, I think. KJC EL KABONG!!!-12/16/1998
163 I guess the Ice Cream Suit is too complicated for the lawyers Cheeky Kid-12/16/1998
162 terke, I recently read a real good article describing almost exactly what'EL KABONG!!!-12/16/1998
161 THIS IS COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC... But I would like to pass a scenario by you peoBrightFuture-12/16/1998
160 I for one have used the term "Max-Pain" point in reference to optionsEstimated Prophet-12/15/1998
159 LG thanks for posting that. The more play stuff like this gets the better for tEstimated Prophet-12/15/1998
158 Another hypothetical scenario to the lawyers: A person was very hungry and ateCheeky Kid-12/15/1998
157 I think that's a very loose interpretation of "Copyright". TherjbIII-12/15/1998
156 Cheeky: You make a valid point as well, of course it does not make either rightHairBall-12/15/1998
155 How many articles, etc....do people photocopy in the office? Most of those areCheeky Kid-12/15/1998
154techstocks.com All these just for today. Not likely to be enforceable. jbIII-12/15/1998
153 Christopher, Legitimate news agencies have not (thus far) expressed much of a EL KABONG!!!-12/15/1998
152 Christopher: You have a valid point. I often see material that seems to be “CopHairBall-12/15/1998
151 Since this is a legal thread, it is interesting to note that the poster of thatThe Philosopher-12/15/1998
150 Estimated Prophet: You might find this post interesting. Message 6844297 RegaHairBall-12/15/1998
149 Nihil - Thanks. More than I ever wanted to know. This is what I was having trClarksterh-12/14/1998
148 Cheeky, The internet we use actually started as a govt. enterprise without any Knighty Tin-12/14/1998
147 <i>Not to be unkind, but this stuff is pretty small cheese. Hey, they didISOMAN-12/14/1998
146 CB, My first exposure was back in the early '80s. My first communication wEL KABONG!!!-12/14/1998
145 KJC, interesting post. When did that happen? My family and I were reminiscingIlaine-12/14/1998
144 CB, Absolutely true. Good find. I was disappointed that there was no mention oEL KABONG!!!-12/14/1998
143 I think it was called Parallel Internet, Universities would only be able to useCheeky Kid-12/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):