SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ADSP - Ariel
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2263 14 0 ADSP
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1688 Ya gotta question the use of words like "won" approval. The card simJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1687 Yes, I looked at it and the first I saw was the $30 ask for my position for aroRockyBalboa-11/27/1999
1686 We were saved by the tape that day IS. The mm was showing the pre-bid 24-30. WJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1685 Indeed. As you say ... the same thing. The same CNBC hyped AVCOs 50x access,RockyBalboa-11/27/1999
1684 I've no position in ADSP, nor have I had one yet. I'm thinking of goingLand Shark-11/27/1999
1683 No. I only took money "the day after" when they opened it at 3 to 5 aRockyBalboa-11/27/1999
1682 When the NASDAQ exchange halted AVCO for two days, so that the company could &qJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1681 LOL!!! that cracks me up. Yeah, you got it. Were you one the rascals that tooDon Pueblo-11/27/1999
1680 I don't think AVCO. AVCO didn't trade as high as 34.00 I don't thiJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1679 Closed at $34? AVCO it was?RockyBalboa-11/27/1999
1678 OK, now you've got me going, It's wrong, and the SEC is responsible. NJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1677 Don't misunderstand me, I've made a lot of money with stocks that are vJim@Inland-11/27/1999
1676nytimes.com Tiny Maker of Modem Part Has Wild Surge in Its Stock -------------D. Chapman-11/27/1999
1675 SEC email address For easy reference, if you are wondering why this happened, Jim@Inland-11/27/1999
1674 Wrong!!! It's simply WRONG, for this "squeeze to have occurred".Jim@Inland-11/27/1999
1673 One more time: The top-line stinks. The company is drowning in red-ink. The solIslander-11/27/1999
1672 Paul, I do feel sorry for the people who lost money on this thing. Hell, I feelHawkeye-11/27/1999
1671 I got some off at 49 so overall this will be ok for me but I definitely will theims2000-11/27/1999
1670 well, Im glad you did well on this stock LG.. but again- you seem to label all Paul A-11/27/1999
1669 Im certain CNBC will put some ridiculous spin on this entire story again on MonPaul A-11/27/1999
1668 ADSP/MEGW news megw has run from 70 cents to 3.00 the last 2 days...not as goodjake burns-11/27/1999
1667 kis...pass out the email addresses for cnbc...i have only sent notes to squawkbcoachbobknight-11/27/1999
1666 Mailed, Faxed and called... will hold my shorts and see a profit in a week. Silmchip-11/27/1999
1665 TLC: Well, my wife thinks I have been taking a break from trading over the ThanHairBall-11/27/1999
1664 email joe kernan... squawk@cnbc.com just put attention joe...let's at leacoachbobknight-11/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News