ECGOF: Anyone following this company? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
ECGOF: Anyone following this company?

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
269	3	0	ECX

Emcee: wang	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
169	I have been trying to get in touch with ECO and have not been able to where di	srvhap	-	3/3/1997
168	Finalization of the merger will be announced either today or tomorrow.	Josh C. Pleasure, M.D.	-	3/3/1997
167	Umm? Am I wrong to have expected SOME news about CHEM merger today? db	dburdick	-	3/3/1997
166	CEO is comfortable with $1.20 for 97 and hopes to better that. Says they can do	david james	-	3/2/1997
165	David, thanks for reply. But, I still question what the growth from the core b	Kevin Chesser	-	3/2/1997
164	ECGOF is currently Canadian registered meaning they don't need to file quar	david james	-	3/2/1997
163	Anyone have current financial statements? I'm new to this thread but find	Kevin Chesser	-	3/1/1997
162	I wonder about the mid 7s for any length of time, because after the Cruttendon	david james	-	3/1/1997
161	What you say is true, but the tape tells me that people were expecting an annou	Michael Anthony	-	3/1/1997
160	- I asked this question on AOL. What difference does it really make? The price	david james	-	3/1/1997
159	Whether announced Monday or not, the company told me that it would NOT be accre	Michael Anthony	-	3/1/1997
158	Lack of news doesn't mean that it hasn't already happened. I would rat	Tim L.	-	2/28/1997
157	Looks pretty quiet on the news front. I suppose they have until midnight to sec	david james	-	2/28/1997
156	Thanks Dave. That's what I meant by being accretive in this quarter. It	Michael Anthony	-	2/27/1997
155	Great post Thanks Dave! FM So that is why we have gone up three days in a row?	Frederick Menslage	-	2/27/1997
154	From what I read on AOL, if the CHEM deal is finished by tomorrow then all of	david james	-	2/27/1997
153	Anyoneknow if CHEMis accretive if finalized before the quarter is over? Michae	Frederick Menslage	-	2/27/1997
152	Close $8.75 on volume of 432,400 I think the funds are starting to move into E	Frederick Menslage	-	2/27/1997
151	The clock will run out, but they can hit the snooze Dear folks, Please refere	Tim L.	-	2/27/1997
150	Has anyone heard anymore on the CHEM deal, we only have one more day before the	srvhap	-	2/26/1997
149	Close $8.375 on volume of 105,500	Frederick Menslage	-	2/26/1997
148	Close $8.1875 on volume of 139,600	Frederick Menslage	-	2/25/1997
147	Anyoneknow if CHEMis accretive if finalized before the quarter is over?	Michael Anthony	-	2/25/1997
146	Hey Michael, That was me (Prof Daves) in my AOL incarnation. That was just wh	david james	-	2/22/1997
145	I just read a post on AOL regarding the NOL's. Apparently, they still have	Michael Anthony	-	2/22/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):