SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1690I don't understand what the tender is. Say I was buying shares for bristol. Oak Tree-9/24/2001
1689Tender offer filing: sec.gov Cheers, Tucktuck-9/24/2001
1688I guess that's the premium BMS is paying for the 40% of profits. Time to re613-9/24/2001
1687From the filing just released: <i>MR. LYNCH: The tender offer should be lcaly-9/24/2001
1686In trying to reason through this, only 20% of the shares are actually worth $70,caly-9/24/2001
1685Ok fans - what's holding us back from $70?613-9/24/2001
1684>>So, assuming the tender occurs in January<< Actually, the tender keokalani'nui-9/23/2001
1683Tender will be for 20% of outstanding stock. Oversubscription, near 100%, is a Jim Haynes-9/23/2001
1682With a $70 tender on the table, the only thing that explains the drop (barring s613-9/23/2001
1681Do you think that the retreat of IMCL today was a normal correction, a manipulatOak Tree-9/21/2001
1680Won't that be surprising if we close right around 55 at options expiration -613-9/21/2001
1679BMY might have more information, but if they do its probably against the law, siOak Tree-9/21/2001
1678I wonder if BMY buys shares on the open market. If so, then they could have pickOak Tree-9/21/2001
1677<<The response by the Oncologists,Hemotologists and the cancer research coOak Tree-9/21/2001
1676You are not up to date. Much more than toxicity related to c-225 has been releastelephonics-9/21/2001
1675The response by the Oncologists,Hemotologists and the cancer research community telephonics-9/21/2001
1674Clearly, people knew this was coming. Big volume, big move up - rarely fails. 613-9/21/2001
1673>All that has been shown to date is that C225 is not very toxic -- and that iJohn Metcalf-9/20/2001
1672I don't wish C225 to be a flash in the pan - I hope it works -- problem is tOak Tree-9/20/2001
1671<<i>C225, the lead drug, is a flash in the pan. Given that Bristol now WTSherman-9/19/2001
1670<<Drugmaker Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (NYSE:BMY - news) said on Wednesday tMiljenko Zuanic-9/19/2001
1669You know Tuck, it might still be great news for shorters. For some reason bristoOak Tree-9/19/2001
1668hmmm the stock is at 56, BMY is paying billions at 70 a share! hmmm I bought thBoplicity-9/19/2001
1667Here's the Reuters story: biz.yahoo.com "Wednesday September 19, 1:58 RCMac-9/19/2001
1666More details... >>> Bristol-Myers Squibb and ImClone Systems Enter InSnowShredder-9/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):