SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
THNK -- Think New Idea -- Rolls Royce of Web Page Creators
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
545 7 0 THNK
Emcee:  David H. Zimmer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
170 Sorry all, I just sold the other half of my position. This stock has run up fGrantcw-4/2/1998
169 Pardon me since I just see this THNK. Why does it move ? Besides the upgrade. IPaul Tran-4/2/1998
168 Last year I bought RADAF at 2 and change, sold it at 10, watched it keep going Kevin G-4/2/1998
167 Craig ~ I'm jealous too but I don't know if the stock is out of hand orJack Sman-4/2/1998
166 This stock is getting out of hand. That's what happens with small floats. craig crawford-4/2/1998
165 'Lucky' stiffs! Nasdaq Level II Jack Sman-4/2/1998
164 Jeff: It is on the move. Hang on tight. Ron Flanigan-4/2/1998
163 Jack, thanks for the Level 2. Always informative. JJonathan Brown-4/2/1998
162 Folks ~ Congratulations on your ride. I had bought in at 14+ and yesterday had Jack Sman-4/2/1998
161 Ya, the 25's are in the rear-view... Looking for a home in the thirties.Kevin G-4/2/1998
160 Did anyone see the 25s? Still going up... GrantGrantcw-4/2/1998
159 Looks like an up morning. ...Bid 25 JeffJeff Jordan-4/2/1998
158 Thank You.Ron Flanigan-4/2/1998
157 OT ... off topicRidemhigher-4/1/1998
156 Ken: Posting question. What do you mean when you begin a statement with OT Ron Flanigan-4/1/1998
155 Yea, I can't wait for the shorts to get excited about this one. More fuelKen Pomaranski-4/1/1998
154 Jan, since THNK closed on its high (or close enough for Internet work), look foJonathan Brown-4/1/1998
153 Sorry! When I said this: << I studied the investment last night for seveKen Pomaranski-4/1/1998
152 Good luck, Craig! I agree with you that the technicals look good. It may blow Ken Pomaranski-4/1/1998
151 << I studied the investment last night for several hours and decided it wcraig crawford-4/1/1998
150 No... I do not have any insights into the arrangements. HP is a very big companKen Pomaranski-4/1/1998
149 *** OT *** My thoughts on RETX are my opinions only. I was just warning peopleKen Pomaranski-4/1/1998
148 << No offense to James, but I do not think that RETX is a good investmencraig crawford-4/1/1998
147 Speaking of winners, does anyone have guess for tomorrow's action? Massivejan_mike-4/1/1998
146 No offense to James, but I do not think that RETX is a good investment. MovingKen Pomaranski-4/1/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News