SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Nanophase Technologies (NANX)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
322 26 0 NANX
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
172 Bill - I have read Value Line Special Situation reports for several years at thraydit-5/4/1998
171 Disagree. Options are typically given to the highest paid employees - the peopChristopher Bearden-5/3/1998
170 You need to talk to IR for exact details. Typically it is employees, venture caOwen Vaughan-5/2/1998
169 RE: Lockout. Would you elaborate on your understanding of the IPO? Who owns Christopher Bearden-5/1/1998
168 Considering the great potential of this company, I would think "insiders&qGator II-4/30/1998
167 Bill, I pick up copies of Value Line OTC at a local library here in St.Louis. david wolf-4/30/1998
166 That's exactly why I just sold my position (after a nice run-up of 30%) anStefan Gruenwald-4/30/1998
165 Short term watch out. Nobody has mentioned it but next month their IPO will be Owen Vaughan-4/30/1998
164 What is the general consensus on NANX - long or short term play? Thread msg trChristopher Bearden-4/30/1998
163 Good job of sleuthing, David! At last we have one plausible reason for the recWWS-4/30/1998
162 <<It could also be insider buying but someone has accumulated a lot of shdavid wolf-4/29/1998
161 Mark, thanks for your reply! I believe that, usually, share buybacks are annouWWS-4/29/1998
160 Bill I agree to a point, however If I sell you a bag of apples worth $8 for $8MARK C.-4/29/1998
159 Mark, I respectfully disagree. Why would NANX want to buy back shares just sixWWS-4/29/1998
158 It appeared that a lot of accumulation was going on the past 3 weeks and all onMARK C.-4/28/1998
157 This is a good stock in my opinion. I have bought and sold NANX several times.Sapper MSG-4/28/1998
156 +15% rebound in two days not bad eh? Looks like the nanocrystalline visionariesDouglas Nordgren-4/28/1998
155 Think we can chalk this up as a bad stock day. See market performances below: Sapper MSG-4/24/1998
154 Don Perkins is one of the preeminent corporate board goverance mavens in the coThomas V. Thornton-4/23/1998
153 Bill, From what i gathered from my father in-law, when he was at Hughes, they Burlitis-4/22/1998
152 That did not escape me at the least Mark, however thanx for highlighting it. MScrapps-4/22/1998
151 Alex, the only structural metalic application mentioned in their latest 10K (MaWWS-4/22/1998
150 Mr. Perkins has not been on the boards named in the previous press release . HeMARK C.-4/22/1998
149 Add Casey Cowels involvement with this company and you're really cooking.Scrapps-4/22/1998
148 Actually, Cummins Engine is a great fit for Nano particles. I wouldn't be Burlitis-4/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):