Moomin Valley (formerly Troll-free Zone)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Moomin Valley (formerly Troll-free Zone)

An SI Board Since August 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2852	27	0	QQQQ

Emcee: Moominoid	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1727	It's the i-ii labels I have a problem with rather than 1383 per se :)	Moominoid	-	9/4/2006
1726	This dude is calling for 1383 for S&P<g> [graphic]	RealMuLan	-	9/3/2006
1725	Was fun to follow your work for as long as I saw no major disagreements with own	skinowski	-	9/3/2006
1724	>>but on the S&P it could go to new post 2002 highs.<< What was	RealMuLan	-	9/3/2006
1723	His Gavekal partners are very bullish though. I agree that the economic fundamen	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1722	The weekly model uses about 500 observations and one variable in that regression	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1721	You are too bullish now, need to read something like this<g>--<i>Bew	RealMuLan	-	9/3/2006
1720	If we get that wave 2 here, perhaps by dropping into op-ex, I'd be satisfied	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1719	What's the 'adjusted R-squared'? Or is that it? Your posts indicate	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1718	Here is the chart I am using: stockcharts.com The forecast is for the weekly s	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1717	What are you mixing in into your model -g/ng? Looking at the stoch, it is "	skinowski	-	9/3/2006
1716	Still thinking it is a double zig-zag or something of that sort. Hard for me to	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1715	Likely will be a couple of days down here which will excite the bears who then w	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1714	Generally, if I see something convoluted and confusing, I think about complex co	skinowski	-	9/3/2006
1713	If AJ over on ihub is correct and the initial move off the July low was a leadin	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1712	Here is my new roadmap: rpi.edu Not sure on the count but maybe my double zigz	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1711	It's gotta be a zigzag, flat or triangle, if it's corrective, right? I t	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1710	Checked page 49... I understand now your train of thought, but I still think i	skinowski	-	9/3/2006
1709	I have just estimated a model using weekly data for the first time. The results	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1708	My sense is that Diamond is the kind of guy who is pretty deliberate in making h	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1707	Diamond sounds pretty certain that the market is going down, whether it was the	Moominoid	-	9/3/2006
1706	Wave d would likely be a flat with a 'c wave failure' The 'a' of	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1705	>>MSFT? LOL<< Why laugh? they are serious, and don't ever under	RealMuLan	-	9/3/2006
1704	No, this is meant to be a formation from classic EW, a running expanding triangl	venividivici	-	9/3/2006
1703	Yes they are taking private some Aussie stuff but market cap of Rio is USD 68bil	Moominoid	-	9/2/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):