SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19080 389 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17330I think that capitulation is a step away. Or it isn't happening. But I stiMeDroogies-6/27/2002
17329I didn't read it as derogatory, and I'm sure Jerome didn't either. MeDroogies-6/27/2002
17328Bob...don't concern yourself with being derogatory....if you had intended toJerome-6/27/2002
17327I'm sorry if that post seemed critical. I didn't mean it to be drogatorrobert b furman-6/27/2002
17326I think Jerome is correct in his management concept, however. ORCL is in a tradMeDroogies-6/27/2002
17325Hi Jerome, Selling calls at a depressed level might get you out of some stock. robert b furman-6/27/2002
17324Plan for today....If ORCL gets near 9.80 then I will sell some -orqgb's JulyJerome-6/27/2002
17323Buy ORCL with a stop at close below 8.50sandeep-6/27/2002
17322Re: The NAZ today - wow. I couldn't believe it - yet it confirmed my earlieehasfjord-6/27/2002
17321Hi Dead Head, You know - I guess there's just enough used car salesman in mrobert b furman-6/26/2002
17320Well, again, that's really just the facts. I guess it could use some flowerMeDroogies-6/26/2002
17319I was referring more to standing up in front of a bunch of customers and reporteDeadHead-6/26/2002
17318>>>when he starts to make stupid statements like these:<<< ItJerome-6/26/2002
17317If not the trough, sure as heck near it. The washouts are out there. InteresMeDroogies-6/26/2002
17316He also is looking for modest top line growth in 2003 meaning the consolidation Lizzie Tudor-6/26/2002
17315mr. droogles, i agree with you. i think ellison is correct and as the saying galydar-6/26/2002
17314Depends on how you view it. I agree that nobody likes to see a market shrinkingMeDroogies-6/26/2002
17313As much as I admire Ellison's technical and business skills, he needs a lot DeadHead-6/26/2002
17312They are not being blamed for fraud,lieing,cheating or cooking the books. Businrobert b furman-6/26/2002
17311FWIW...not that I give this stuff much credit. But Barton Biggs has been extraoMeDroogies-6/26/2002
17310I'm in to technical indicators a bit, and they've been really ugly the lMeDroogies-6/26/2002
17309>>>I'm looking at the doji star that formed at the end of today.<Jerome-6/26/2002
17308>>Sort of puts the Halo on Orcl Oh, how do you figure that?JakeStraw-6/26/2002
17307Hi ehasfjord, Open will be ugly. One thing nice about owning a washed out stocrobert b furman-6/26/2002
17306Below is the compx... IT IS UGLY! Don't know if you're into candles, sehasfjord-6/25/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):