LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1734	Wow Don I already own a bunch but after reading that post I'm buying more e	dds1	-	5/5/2000
1733	Greeze, that kind of belief is going to keep you out of the big money. Wake up,	Don Johnstone	-	5/5/2000
1732	greeze, You're Failing in bashing 101 is that the best you got?	Mike Hardy	-	5/5/2000
1731	I doubt if .0001% of SI members have the technical expertise to know exactly wh	Herc	-	5/5/2000
1730	Greeze 5 post all bashing Lumm..Why? Who would pay to join a service only to b	dds1	-	5/5/2000
1729	Exactly, Molex does count! So you think Lumenon has given Molex working parts?	greeze	-	5/5/2000
1728	Give me a break. If you refer to Lumenon's WEB site these are Preliminary P	greeze	-	5/5/2000
1727	I apologize to everyone but that's a post from a moron. Do you really belie	dds1	-	5/4/2000
1726	<<<without ever having shown a single working part to anyone.>>&	Don Johnstone	-	5/4/2000
1725	LUMM has product specs: This is their 8 channel DWDM lumenon.com Number of C	wopr1	-	5/4/2000
1724	The Lumenon hype continues with press announcement after press announcement on	greeze	-	5/4/2000
1723	Don't be so impatient --- it will get there	Bob Burke	-	5/3/2000
1722	I e-mailed SI to change LUMM to the "Communications" forum from "	SecularBull	-	5/3/2000
1721	"Given that the MOLX involvement puts a ceiling to their sales potential	fibrehound*	-	5/3/2000
1720	<<<Given that the MOLX involvement puts a ceiling to their sales poten	Don Johnstone	-	5/3/2000
1719	<i>Just Curious; what one factor would swing you off undecided into buyin	Walter Prager	-	5/3/2000
1718	<<<I can make up my own mind.>>> Glad to hear it; that's	Don Johnstone	-	5/3/2000
1717	I don't think Pat was offering any advice at all. I was one of the people	Walter Prager	-	5/3/2000
1716	The fact that Pat Mudge has reached a conclusion as to the merits of LUMM puts	Fred McCutcheon	-	5/3/2000
1715	*Wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole* Pat, thanks for that. Now I k	Don Johnstone	-	5/2/2000
1714	Why are Pat's posts not worth reading? Get your head out of the sand. Pat h	jjs64	-	5/2/2000
1713	Pat Then your postings are not worth reading anymore	dds1	-	5/1/2000
1712	I think I've made it pretty clear I'm biased when it comes to LUMM. Wo	pat mudge	-	5/1/2000
1711	Unless you do this routinely for every company you post information on...you ar	dds1	-	5/1/2000
1710	Latest insider trading: Insider Name * Rel * # of Shares * Trans Type * Trans	pat mudge	-	4/24/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):