SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1743No, that's not necessary anymore, Jorj. There are enough who trusted me alrCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1742So how do you account for the people who traded picks, as you did, and made moneDave O.-7/21/2003
1741<i>Show me and others the names of the "thousands of lives" thatCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1740until then, people are supposed to send their private information to you directlJorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1739You'll find out in due course.CountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1738never met him, not my friend. So which law firm is handling the class action?Jorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1737You might want to ask your friend Leslie and his "nice family" first. CountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1736<i>And let's review what YOU said. "Let me tell you something mayCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1735Ok, I want in on this class action lawsuit....who are the lawyers handling it? Jorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1734< SI had enormous promise in early 1998. So did trading. A few people destroyDave O.-7/21/2003
1733You stated to SIAdmin Bob: "Please explain to me a single "threat"Dave O.-7/21/2003
1732I just wrote someone something, which I won't discuss publicly, but it has aCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1731Hey Bob, You threatened me today and I told you to take a hike with your threatCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1730<i>Do you think that the criminal code will supercede laws pertaining to sCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1729If SI committed no wrongdoing, where's the threat? If I say explain to me hCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1728exactly, you showed me the law. Because you can cut and paste clauses in from tJorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1727I just showed you the law. So, if the advertising was misleading, the service wCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1726I'm going to guess that you aren't going to share the evidence of this: Jorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1725Well I can't control what the D.A. or A.G. might do, and the levying of crimCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1724I don't purport to be a lawyer, if that's what you mean. <i>The mCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1723yup, you are going to have to prove criminal actions without the benefit of the Jorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1722I know that you view yourself as a great legal mind and I assure you that my traJorj X Mckie-7/21/2003
1721Thanks. Higher ups from Mars vs. SI Administration seems an analogy of two dissCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1720I never told you SI would get "dragged into" anything. Have I said I CountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
1719Note that last clause: <i><b>Any violation of the provisions of thiCountofMoneyCristo-7/21/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News