SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Glenayre Technologies(GEMS)- a pure cellular PCS play?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3431 33 0 GEMS
Emcee:  Malladi Prasad Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1756 jeff, i'm still here. my sell at $20 3/8 looks good today ;-) i had to meSkeeter Bug-8/14/1997
1755 Well not nearly enough buying today. I doubt very seriously that the announcemeJeffrey L. Henken-8/14/1997
1754 MacNamee was his name...and i saw the program...in the wireless sector, he mentvan wang-8/14/1997
1753 Sounds good Jim. I've traded in and out of ASND but still own plenty of GEMJeffrey L. Henken-8/14/1997
1752 There was "the Peter Lynch of the tech sector" on MoneyLine last nigjim detwiler-8/14/1997
1751 I noticed several officers at MOT had sold quite a few shares recently. The selJeffrey L. Henken-8/11/1997
1750 Subject: Northern Telecom Invests In `Unified Messaging' Technolvan wang-8/11/1997
1749 ubject: Frost & Sullivan: Paging Equipment and Services, Will Movan wang-8/11/1997
1748 why should it matter whether this stock is in our retirement funds?...quite fravan wang-8/9/1997
1747 Well I hope I'll be able to say good buy about my latest purchase of GEMS. Jeffrey L. Henken-8/9/1997
1746 jeff, when an insider sells 1% of their shares at high prices and gets berated Skeeter Bug-8/9/1997
1745 Gee Tim, you have a pretty jaded view of GEMS and probably the stockmarket in gJeffrey L. Henken-8/9/1997
1744 Are these the same guys who bought Gems a year ago between 40 and 50$? Or wereTIM WORTHEN-8/8/1997
1743 Alright we have heard the paging is dying stuff before. But if this is true theJeffrey L. Henken-8/8/1997
1742 i hope it works out for both of us...it just cant get any cheaper then arbitragvan wang-8/7/1997
1741 Van, I guess your opinion on MDEA is right, so I bot some today and have a smalgene shen-8/7/1997
1740 Well friends and neighbors, just a little lower and I'm all the way back inJeffrey L. Henken-8/7/1997
1739 Any ideas why today's decline? Here's a guess: biz.yahoo.com KevinKevin K. Spurway-8/7/1997
1738 amir and everyone...if anyone is looking for a small co. who will benefit from van wang-8/7/1997
1737 my anwsers: MVP and CNET!!!....and its the same old complaint about pagingvan wang-8/6/1997
1736 Explain how Gems fits into this future. I have been away on vacation and justTIM WORTHEN-8/6/1997
1735 All, In the conference call Glenayre's management mentioned that the companmilo minderbender-8/6/1997
1734 >>i would not pay 20X for expected 10-15% top line growth<< over aSkeeter Bug-8/5/1997
1733 amir...i am in at 8 15/16 bought more than i initially thought...am content if van wang-8/5/1997
1732 PAGE is a buy now...quite an impressive hire...it was painful to watch the gap van wang-8/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News