SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2891 47 0 FCM
Emcee:  Seth L. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1766 Thanks...good perspective...but one has to ask the question why if they are so Charles Broderick-9/9/1999
1765 Charles, I wouldn't pretend to be capable of inspiring you <G>, but, Richard J Lamarre-9/9/1999
1764 I completely understand your point of view..... Watching the thread here and onCharles Broderick-9/9/1999
1763 I made an oversight as to who the players are in this article. At the end ofRichard J Lamarre-9/9/1999
1762 Thomas, Come on, you understand. As does anyone else that has been following tLowtherAcademy-9/9/1999
1761 Charles, just quoting the article. I make no inference as to its impact. RickRichard J Lamarre-9/9/1999
1760 Mike, I'm afraid I don't understand, there has been much talk about tNoneyet-9/9/1999
1759 Are you saying that that brought the price from last week's disaster to 2, Charles Broderick-9/9/1999
1758 Mike, that was the entire article; three paragraphs. I did, however, exclude (Richard J Lamarre-9/9/1999
1757 Thanks Richard for the posting. So, FCM's article or comments refer to &qulostmymoney-9/9/1999
1756 Hello Denny, here's the article from the Fortune Sept 27 edition: It appearRichard J Lamarre-9/9/1999
1755 FWIW, the last 31 trades of the day had only one at 1 15/16, the rest were at detroit denny-9/8/1999
1754 Couldn't resist $2.00.bought 800 more. 2days vol now 35,500 Was it a smart detroit denny-9/8/1999
1753 Great FIRST sentence ! u nailed himdetroit denny-9/7/1999
1752 I don't get it, you post your lat. & long. ( no pun intended ) today, yNoneyet-9/7/1999
1751 Calling him an idiot, is actually an insult to idiots. And I know a few of themTimbo-9/7/1999
1750 somebody, PLEEZE....the toilet wasn't turned off jp taxgun-9/7/1999
1749 I have some additional questions for you. I wonder how much of usat's accoNoneyet-9/7/1999
1748 Charles / Shareholder of Ireland, I am sure your post made some sense to you, Noneyet-9/7/1999
1747 Since the shorts cant short it any shorter and the longs can only long it longeCharles Broderick-9/7/1999
1746 Hey bully, get off your bully pulpit and do some research. You certainly have aNoneyet-9/7/1999
1745 Interesting Raging Bull post!!! ragingbull.comCharles Broderick-9/5/1999
1744 Joseph... "Idiot" is the understatement of the year! He will be in Brett S.-9/4/1999
1743 the "idiots" always leave when a stock price gets better...wonder whytaxgun-9/4/1999
1742 Sorry Buzz, I will not Respond to the Idiot again. It's Been A long time poNeil Wicker-9/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):