SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1788David: "Right now I have no desire to burn my fingers in the market and soChip Roos-12/5/2000
1787Yes, I have recently taken a tiny flier in a small company called Sonic SolutionDavid W. Taylor-12/4/2000
1786OT> I completely understand, simple FA to make your decisions. Do you like SSpecialK-12/4/2000
1785BRCM has a P/E ratio of 184.90 suggesting it is around 10 times overvalued. A coDavid W. Taylor-12/4/2000
1784David, "market darling", what are your thoughts on BRCM, PMCS, AMCC? SpecialK-12/4/2000
1783"Related Quotes CNXT 22 7/8 +1 7/16 delayed 20 mins - disclaimer MoChip Roos-12/4/2000
1782The problem with your analysis is the phrase "market darling." As we David W. Taylor-12/4/2000
1781David, In a space of PMCS, AMCC, VTSS, TXCC, exists a CNXT spinco. This divisionSpecialK-12/4/2000
1780Palm and 3Com is a very different story. In fact, back when I was interested inDavid W. Taylor-12/4/2000
1779David, What do you think of 3Com spinning off Palm? Investor X had 3Com at $27, SpecialK-12/4/2000
1778Of course I was closer than all those "analysts." The difference is sDavid W. Taylor-12/4/2000
1777Actually, he's been posting that the stock is going to be below $20. $18-16MeDroogies-12/4/2000
1776Embedded security on a chip. ny-web1.businesswire.com. As for David, You shouldGerald Schickling-12/4/2000
1775Joebad: Thanks for the warning...just wondering why you say that. I always fChip Roos-12/4/2000
1774Be careful what you ask for and/or of whom, Mr. Roos.joebad-12/3/2000
1773Since David Taylor was kind enough to notify me via private message that I was iChip Roos-12/3/2000
1772Call it pump and spin or whatever but in my opinion this company's stock priChip Roos-12/3/2000
1771Yet another pump and spin article about Conexant in the December 2 issue of BarrDavid W. Taylor-12/2/2000
1770Based on bear market trends, most stocks are fairly valued now. The issue is tMeDroogies-11/30/2000
1769I think you want to buy it at $16 or less as a margin of safety issue. The fair FACTUAL-11/30/2000
1768>> In this case CNXT is a buy at $16 and a sell at $28. In the middle it iDavid W. Taylor-11/29/2000
1767The value of Conexant is easy to determine. Post split the Internet Appliance grFACTUAL-11/29/2000
1766Another pump 'em up article on Conexant in the November 27 issue of Fortune David W. Taylor-11/21/2000
1765The board's been pretty quiet lately.....whazzzzup? We've had some niceLou Weed-11/15/2000
1764FYI -- Message 14747340Sun Tzu-11/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News