A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board

An SI Board Since February 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
18940	133	0

Emcee: OldAIMGuy	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
17939	Good morning Steve, Let's hope that pep talk in D.C. gets the market moving	OldAIMGuy	-	1/30/2002
17938	Good morning all: I'm assuming most of you also had some AIM purchases yest	Steve Grabczyk	-	1/30/2002
17937	Thanks for the information Tom. Just putting the finishing touches on the alpha	aptus	-	1/29/2002
17936	The AIM/Idiot Wave Newsletter is available at aim-users.com Best regards, Tom	OldAIMGuy	-	1/29/2002
17935	Hi Grabber, I've not yet written the report, but you may be happy to know th	OldAIMGuy	-	1/29/2002
17934	Hi Tom: I agree completely (on ROaCAR). I was only kidding about the Chevy! T	Steve Grabczyk	-	1/28/2002
17933	Hi Robert and Jack, Please don't confuse a tool for a measurement. ROCAR is	OldAIMGuy	-	1/28/2002
17932	Hi Steve, As I calculate it, it is return on <i>average</i> capital	OldAIMGuy	-	1/28/2002
17931	Hi Mark, I guess I was in too big a hurry! Sorry for the error.... It should be	OldAIMGuy	-	1/28/2002
17930	Hi Robert, My thoughts are similar. I am using the XIRR() function and update	Jack Jagernauth	-	1/27/2002
17929	The focus on ROCAR bothers me, at least a bit. Yes this is valuable information	rgammon	-	1/27/2002
17928	Maybe we should use Return On Average Capital At Risk -- ROACAR. No never mind.	Steve Grabczyk	-	1/27/2002
17927	Hello Tom, Thanks for the details. Based on what both you and Barry have writte	aptus	-	1/26/2002
17926	Hello Barry, Nice to hear from you again. Welcome back to Canada (sorry it had	aptus	-	1/26/2002
17925	It occurred to me to check my AIM "Dictionary" to see if I'd ever	OldAIMGuy	-	1/26/2002
17924	Hi Mark, In your formula the divisor is actually a decimal. For each period, the	OldAIMGuy	-	1/26/2002
17923	Hi Mark, Tom's method for calculating ROCAR is really an approximation meth	labestul	-	1/26/2002
17922	Hello Tom, Regarding your ROCAR calculation, it appears that you take the profi	aptus	-	1/25/2002
17921	Hi Tom, The way I handled it was that when a triple finally occurred, I didn'	OldAIMGuy	-	1/25/2002
17920	Tom V Something I've been thinking about lately in regards to AIM Twinvest a	areokat	-	1/25/2002
17919	Hi Keith and John, Over the years Value Line's "Worst Performing Stocks	OldAIMGuy	-	1/25/2002
17918	>>It seems that only a government could be so generous with its employees&	areokat	-	1/25/2002
17917	Hi JL, You've pretty well narrowed down the three components of failure in i	OldAIMGuy	-	1/25/2002
17916	Hi again James, The gains made from a buy point to a sell point inside AIM are d	OldAIMGuy	-	1/25/2002
17915	Hi Steve, After the air was let out of the Bubble in 2000 CTXS has had a very AI	OldAIMGuy	-	1/25/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):