SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18935 133 0
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17978Steve, Thanks very much for quick response. Gee, I feel part of the community aSarmad Y. Hermiz-2/2/2002
17977Good morning Sarmad, and welcome. "SAFE": Stock Adjustment Factor EqSteve Grabczyk-2/2/2002
17976Hi Tom, I've been following the conversation here for a few weeks, and ISarmad Y. Hermiz-2/2/2002
17975Hi JS, 35% looks pretty good for some of my stocks. When I checked CHIR, I foundOldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17974Hello Tom. Glad to hear you're hard at work on the zigzag metric. I hope youJSLyons-2/1/2002
17973Hi JSL, Nice move! Nothing like the Sales Dept doing its job to brighten up the OldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17972Good morning Steve, I was just looking at CHIR, an old time holding of mine withOldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17971Morning, Steve, I've been using zigzag as 'confirmation' that my AIJSLyons-2/1/2002
17970Good morning Tom: Are you still up? What the heck were you doing @ 2:00 am? TSteve Grabczyk-2/1/2002
17969Hi Steve, The Stockcharts page on Zigzag also says it's better at historicalOldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17968Hi Steve, I guess I think of W%R as "confirmation" because usually I&#OldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17967Hi Steve, "Greed eventually will surpass fear. Doesn't it always untilOldAIMGuy-2/1/2002
17966...also copied from IH post: ZIG ZAG caution: from the TA A-Z site: InterpretaSteve Grabczyk-1/31/2002
17965copied from my post @ IH: Tom: I think the W%R is somewhat more predictive thanSteve Grabczyk-1/31/2002
17964Tom: I think I'm the bald guy in that 'toon! TYC did open strong (I waSteve Grabczyk-1/31/2002
17963>>Maybe someone heard the IW's softened up again.<< Tom Better eareokat-1/31/2002
17962Thanks Steve, Nice note. TVOldAIMGuy-1/31/2002
17961Hi Steve, You're up about five bucks this AM on that most recent purchase. NOldAIMGuy-1/31/2002
17960Hi E, <i>"To increase income I often sell covered calls..."<OldAIMGuy-1/31/2002
17959Hi Tom, And again this AM the markets seem to be struggling upwards. Maybe someOldAIMGuy-1/31/2002
17958sam, ist bought in almost 2 years ago at over $28, so i guess this would qualisteve in socal-1/31/2002
17957Hi all: I just posted this on IH. In response to Rien: You're asking two Steve Grabczyk-1/31/2002
17956Tom, The challenge we all face is that we have objectives for the size of ourgammon-1/31/2002
17955Hey guys! I picked up some more TYC near the open this morning @ 30.10. It cloSteve Grabczyk-1/30/2002
17954Hi Tom. Thank you for your welcome. I have been using AIM less than a year. But,eik-1/30/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News