LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1834	Yankee Trader Would you like to trade info? Email me at opticalhound@aol.com Jo	fibrehound*	-	6/23/2000
1833	This coverage, obviously, from Kimball and Cross in Boston. Monday June 19, 10	Don Johnstone	-	6/19/2000
1832	YT, what "coverage" and who is "Mr. Biernet"? eom DJ	Don Johnstone	-	6/19/2000
1831	*has recanted this* Well, YT, I don't know if this recantation strengt	Don Johnstone	-	6/19/2000
1830	Coverage nice to have. Mr. Biernet tells me he is basing it on $80 mil revenue	Yankee Trader	-	6/19/2000
1829	So LUMM moves to its new plant. Big deal! I think that has been a given for q	Yankee Trader	-	6/19/2000
1828	YT, don't have the date. Here is the link: molex.com The 1999 annual repor	s-words	-	6/14/2000
1827	S-WORDS, Love the way that letter reads. Will you share with me the date of t	Yankee Trader	-	6/14/2000
1826	From Molex Letter to Shareholders: "Other smaller, but technically strateg	s-words	-	6/14/2000
1825	That's pretty vague...again, do you think the rather distinguished board me	s-words	-	6/8/2000
1824	Its all in the thread, just go back and read the posts. Buyer Beware!	jjs64	-	6/8/2000
1823	This thread has been very informative to day, thanks everyone, keep it up.	Lhn5	-	6/6/2000
1822	Are u upset cuz u didn't buy at 9 last week? Not bad for pure garbage huh?	Mike Hardy	-	6/6/2000
1821	Thank you YT. Now I think that that would be totally to be expected, but others	Don Johnstone	-	6/6/2000
1820	This AM, I was told by a very reliable source that an order from CSCO is soon	Yankee Trader	-	6/6/2000
1819	jjs64, you had better get on board the train soon. LUMM is leaving the station,	Don Johnstone	-	6/6/2000
1818	jjs - Can you expand on the "notorious Canadian stock hustler" commen	s-words	-	6/6/2000
1817	IMO any move upwards in LUMM is unjustified, since it is pure garbage. Just ano	jjs64	-	6/6/2000
1816	jjs - You know the reason for this move, and can therefore judge whether it is	s-words	-	6/6/2000
1815	dds1; Not likely, especially considering that LUMM broke $10 well before its c	jjs64	-	6/6/2000
1814	jjs64 I here the sounds of a crow.	dds1	-	6/6/2000
1813	It is highly unusual, and quite misleading. LUMM gave cheap stock (in the form	jjs64	-	6/6/2000
1812	My understanding of this rather odd situation is that it was required by the SE	Don Johnstone	-	6/5/2000
1811	pat mudge or Don Johnstone I read the 10Q I am intruiged with the way LUMM ar	Fred McCutcheon	-	6/4/2000
1810	Bright Lights redherring.com ************* Optical integrated circuits Wil	Don Johnstone	-	6/4/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):