SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1853<I>Where science goes astray is when atheists and agnostics try to teach tcarranza2-12/31/2005
1852Inspiring story by a Tulane doctor about working at Big Charity during the KatriIlaine-12/31/2005
1851100 years ago nobody even knew that the bacterial rotary motor existed. Did thaIlaine-12/31/2005
1850I don't see how the article refutes Intelligent Design. Reduced to its simpIlaine-12/31/2005
1849Humans have some faculties that facilitate advancement, which we may call "Ilaine-12/31/2005
1848I do believe in God, and that God is the Creator, and that the universe was creaIlaine-12/31/2005
1847<i> When anyone produces a good explanation as to how something like the bTimF-12/30/2005
1846You realize in Dennett you have possibly the most biased person on earth on the Brumar89-12/30/2005
1845>>Darwin -- by showing us how purpose and design, meaning, can arise out oLane3-12/30/2005
1844This interview in my opinion beautifully sets forth the case against ID in the Icarranza2-12/29/2005
1843<i>Not sure where we can take this discussion further. You're ruling oLane3-12/29/2005
1842Not sure where we can take this discussion further. You're ruling out the iBrumar89-12/29/2005
1841I found this amusing. Also found the bolded phrase and odd differentiation amonLane3-12/29/2005
1840<I>I prefer to think that humanity is reaching out for enlightenment, at lcarranza2-12/29/2005
1839<i>this felicitous view is not necessarily one which is a given.</i>Lane3-12/29/2005
1838The problem with the entire conversation is whether anyone can accept that the ncarranza2-12/29/2005
1837<I> "So if we could prove that say the Christian version of God reallTimF-12/29/2005
1836<i>But, if he remains opague (so to speak) and reveal himself in some way Lane3-12/29/2005
1835<b><i>So if we could prove that say the Christian version of God reaMary Cluney-12/29/2005
1834It seems Sacco & Vanzetti were guilty after all: <b> Sinclair Letter TConstant Reader-12/29/2005
1833<i>Fascinating idea, and nothing more.</i> I would find it charmingLane3-12/29/2005
1832Suppose a scientist found copyright marks on the human genome. Or maybe foundIlaine-12/29/2005
1831<i>The definition of supernatural does not include non-existance.</i>Lane3-12/28/2005
1830<i> If something exists, then it is, by definition, part of the natural wTimF-12/28/2005
1829I can only repeat what I originally said. If something exists, then it is, by dLane3-12/28/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):