SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1859jjs64 Why not stop the bad energy now. You fought a good fight, as DJ said forgdds1-7/4/2000
1858<<<MOLX's own Xavier Clairarbin>>> Past tense. He doesn&Don Johnstone-7/3/2000
1857jjs64 Grasping for straws...I here the crow. 200k 144 shame on you. To me that dds1-7/3/2000
1856Great news? Read closer my over-optimistic friend. I particularly like this bit:jjs64-7/3/2000
1855Great news. Thanks. This LUMM/Molex agreement shows it is a developing arrangeDon Johnstone-6/30/2000
1854Lumenon and Molex Modify and Restructure Agreement Lumenon to Directly Benefit fibrehound*-6/30/2000
1853News out and the price is moving strongly up: siliconinvestor.comdebra vogt-6/30/2000
1852 They say you have no balls? Mine are stainless steel. Try 'em sometime.Ben Wa-6/27/2000
1851 These specs are state of the art, don't you agree, even if only preliminaryDon Johnstone-6/25/2000
1850 dds1 What I do not understand is why is it that only Lumenon investors claim tgreeze-6/25/2000
1849 McClutcheon This is the second time you have made unsolicited ignorant statemedds1-6/24/2000
1848 Loosen your collar nerd, if you would go back a few post you will see I'm dds1-6/24/2000
1847 <<If you can't you should be man enough to say so, even if you donFred McCutcheon-6/24/2000
1846 Pat Don't hide in you shell because I am not asking for revenue numbers. Idds1-6/24/2000
1845 My point with your criteria that a company with one customer has no credibilitydds1-6/24/2000
1844 Pat, I am sorry that Lumm and others have to suffer the brunt of your frustratiYankee Trader-6/24/2000
1843 <i>Try not to be so harsh....you have slanderous tones in your message/s.pat mudge-6/24/2000
1842 <i>I was a shareholder of Cien when they had one customer.</i> Abopat mudge-6/24/2000
1841 "So far they represent everything I detest in get-rich-quick, investors-ardds1-6/24/2000
1840 Pat and Don, please excuse me, but I must interrupt your discussion. Pat, I aYankee Trader-6/23/2000
1839 <<<the best money can buy>>> I thought Oprah had all the monDon Johnstone-6/23/2000
1838 <i>And get a lawyer, too.</i> I have one, and the best money can bpat mudge-6/23/2000
1837 <<<kind of companies.>>> Pat, quit beating about the bush. IDon Johnstone-6/23/2000
1836 <i>I read somewhere that you had soften your stand on Lumm, decreasing yopat mudge-6/23/2000
1835 Pat Mudge I read somewhere that you had soften your stand on Lumm, decreasingdds1-6/23/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News