SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1864 Good post Pawan! It must be nice to have management like SGI that returns valuMark Madden-6/3/2000
1863 Does someone know why SEG couldn't distribute VRTS shares the way SGI is goPawan Lingras-6/3/2000
1862 More SEG cuts. biz.yahoo.com I believe this is about 50,000 cuts from their 1Mark Madden-6/2/2000
1861 Thanks, Sam. As far as the vote on the proposed "larceny" (well saidStruggling Investor-5/29/2000
1860 Trish, <<can you even believe the hypocrisy in their "realizing vSam-5/29/2000
1859 Thanks, Mark; also thank you so very much for your weekly pricing reports (thinStruggling Investor-5/27/2000
1858 Trish - Good digging! All but $86 million of this $600 million was sold in prMark Madden-5/27/2000
1857 From the SNDK board: SEG's the bad guy here, here's the trail of breadStruggling Investor-5/27/2000
1856 <i>In a perfect world stockholders will vote down the SEG deal, new managRobert Douglas-5/26/2000
1855 I'm anxious to vote "NO" also. I think SEG management is dragginMark Madden-5/26/2000
1854 I believe that if you all think the deal is a lousy one- I suggest that you wriMadharry-5/26/2000
1853 Mark and Thread- Just saw CNBC's Maria report on production problems at IBMMikeM54321-5/26/2000
1852 How will the institutional investors vote? My guess is they will use complex fMark Madden-5/25/2000
1851 OT: Access Investing <i>"By the way, you sure are becoming famous wMikeM54321-5/23/2000
1850 Mike, <i>How come I haven't gotten a proxy in the mail? And did anyoRobert Douglas-5/23/2000
1849 <i>"I found only two reason that they needed to take the stock privaMikeM54321-5/22/2000
1848 As I am skimming through the SEG SEC filing (500 pages) a few points caught my Mark Madden-5/21/2000
1847 IBM announces delivery problems on 10,000 RPM Driveshttp://dailynews.yahoo.coJJB-5/20/2000
1846 <b>Seagate's divestiture of SanDisk.</b> Message 13744243 AusAusdauer-5/20/2000
1845 SEC Filing freeedgar.comStruggling Investor-5/19/2000
1844 <<. Of course, before taking it public again, he will probably have sold Z Analyzer-5/17/2000
1843 <<They go on to explain $27 is a good price for SEG now because there areZ Analyzer-5/17/2000
1842 Man, SSB is a w**re, looking for future business from both VRTS and SEG. Their Sam-5/17/2000
1841 Solomon Smith Barney (SSB) came out with a lengthily report recommending SEG stMark Madden-5/17/2000
1840 good point, Z; if I heard that remark (which certainly seems self-serving,) I hStruggling Investor-5/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):