SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Valley Group
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2946 26 0 SVGI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1871 Katherine RE: DUV lenses Reading your smiconductoronline article reminded me ofJames Word-10/2/1998
1870 Just a clarification on the ASML system. The one going to IMEC will not be theKatherine Derbyshire-10/1/1998
1869 Robert: RE a bunch of stuff. TEL is definitely the company to beat in tracks wJames Word-10/1/1998
1868 James, Thanks for the info. Do you know how FSI is doing in track or is TEL eFJB-10/1/1998
1867 Robert RE: "the canning of the 200-APS. " Yeah, that really caught James Word-10/1/1998
1866 The surprising thing about the press release the other day was the canning of tFJB-10/1/1998
1865 Don't forget that SVGI also hit a 52-week low today, although it did close Artslaw-10/1/1998
1864 Up 5/8 on a day like today? Has this stock run out of sellers? -Ritz Ritz-10/1/1998
1863 I totally agree, and AMAT has the cash to do it...if they use this down turn toPhantom Dialer-9/30/1998
1862 Wouldn't you think that AMAT would have to like this company at just slightdavid alexander-9/30/1998
1861 Thanks Lafayette I just read through the past twenty or so posts. If you havPhantom Dialer-9/30/1998
1860 Silicon Valley Group Announces Restructuring biz.yahoo.comFJB-9/30/1998
1859 Bob, I've said before that this seems like an incredible potential to pick david alexander-9/28/1998
1858 Yes, the yen/dollar exchange rate is not good for business. You've correctFJB-9/28/1998
1857 Yes...I meant "loses." Robert Floyd-9/28/1998
1856 My observation: Until the dollar losed quite a bit of value relative to the yRobert Floyd-9/28/1998
1855 So do you have something to say about SVGI or do you just get a kick out of wasFJB-9/28/1998
1854 It is poor logic that I shouldn't post because I haven't posted. Then wRobert Floyd-9/28/1998
1853 I suggest you mind your own business. For someone who has never contributed a FJB-9/28/1998
1852 I suggest you drop it Bob. You've made your point. If people choose to dRobert Floyd-9/28/1998
1851 I'm sorry. I have nothing of value to share. All I know is what I have rLafayette-9/28/1998
1850 RE:<i>My Lithography friend just asked me to check the rumors which were FJB-9/28/1998
1849 Don't scratch too hard, Bob. My Lithography friend just asked me to check Lafayette-9/28/1998
1848 Ian, You seem doubtful of information presented on Yahoo... :-) Upon readingFJB-9/27/1998
1847 Bob, I wouldn't find it unusual if I wanted to be the source of a new rumoIan@SI-9/27/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):