SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Apricus Biosciences
An SI Board Since September 2014
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2026 18 0 APRI
Emcee:  mokelumne river Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1876OC, who is MK? The statement that "no additional clinical studies expectedmokelumne river-4/22/2016
1875MK, I do not share your optimism and therefore will not buy a single share more.oldcoach19-4/22/2016
1874My buy order is now in. It certainly would have been filled earlier this morninmokelumne river-4/22/2016
1873Yeah. They filled one of my buys. 1 / 3 I still have 2 more GTC orders placMirror Image-4/22/2016
1872>I already have too many shares - but if they want to walk the PPS lower - thmokelumne river-4/22/2016
1871Good point, MI. The company has repeated its claim that they do not believe themokelumne river-4/20/2016
1870I should note that Pascoe's only expert in dealing with the FDA is Troupin wMirror Image-4/20/2016
1869Hentied please keep your silly comments on the IHUB Board ... apriluv-4/20/2016
1868If Denner bought out the existing notes, which I would assume would be availableMirror Image-4/20/2016
1867I am going to suggest that the asset that Denner wanted to control was Fispemifemokelumne river-4/20/2016
1866If Denner bought out the existing notes, which I would assume would be availablehentied-4/20/2016
1865Denner already has the required shares to be in control. However, he is only alphoenix_rising-4/20/2016
1864Ok, now what?? Denner assumes control? Old Boar "The Annual Meeting will beOldBoar-4/19/2016
1863Yeah, Forendo is who comes to mind. They are going to continue working with FispMirror Image-4/19/2016
1862PR it certainly does make sense that it could be Forendo getting out, and I certStrong Long-4/19/2016
1861I have been thinking about Pascoe and tend to agree that there should be accountmokelumne river-4/19/2016
1860Anyone have any thoughts as to why the volume is consistently higher in this lowphoenix_rising-4/19/2016
1859The Abstract is from 2015 ... Great Article on efficacy of Vitaros ... Approval apriluv-4/18/2016
1858Clinical efficacy and safety of Vitaros©/Virirec© (Alprostadil cream) apriluv-4/18/2016
1857MI as always thanks for digging in and in this case bringing attention to some vStrong Long-4/18/2016
1856Yes. I had read the public assessment report ( a very long time ago - this seemsMirror Image-4/16/2016
1855If anyone has the time to read the article I posted last week, there really is qStrong Long-4/16/2016
1854Thanks MI, I'll take circumstantial right now. You are correct, IR never gotStrong Long-4/16/2016
1853I'm guessing NO response yet from our "Wonderful" I.R. department?Mirror Image-4/16/2016
1852Makes sense as there is not much for Dr. Troupin to do. Doesn't appear thatmokelumne river-4/15/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News