SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
DELL Bear Thread
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2578 11 0 DELL
Emcee:  jjs_ynot Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1878 Geoff - <i>Intel's task of smoothing its own inventory would be maderudedog-9/7/1998
1877 Gary, re: <i>If I'm taking rudedogs position it's pure coincideGeoff Nunn-9/7/1998
1876 Gary, If you wish to criticize my position that's fine - I welcome it. IGeoff Nunn-9/7/1998
1875 Geoff, If I'm taking rudedogs position it's pure coincidence. I'mThe Phoenix-9/7/1998
1874 Ooops, you're right. Thanks for the correction. Geoff Nunn-9/7/1998
1873 re: <i>DELL has succeeded in shifting inventory costs from DELL to INTC&Geoff Nunn-9/7/1998
1872 Geoff - If you read the post you gave to Michelle, you will understand what I rudedog-9/7/1998
1871 Geoff - <i>run as high as an estimated 12-13 weeks </i> You'rerudedog-9/7/1998
1870 I was referring to CPQ's purchasing habits from INTC. Intel can better preThe Phoenix-9/6/1998
1869 Michelle, Drew Swiss and Chuzzlewit did a great job on inventory turns a few wGeoff Nunn-9/6/1998
1868 Sorry to be redundant, but I thought cpq had <i>at least</i> 16 invLizzie Tudor-9/6/1998
1867 Gary, Rudedog has already stated that Intel provides CPQ with price protectionGeoff Nunn-9/6/1998
1866 Geoff, I do not have to have knowledge of that level of detail to assert that jim kelley-9/6/1998
1865 Pricing - interesting discussion. Let me propose a scenario. CPQ purchases inThe Phoenix-9/6/1998
1864 Jim, Glad to see you jump into this discussion, even if only to respond to oneGeoff Nunn-9/6/1998
1863 I just read the posts where jim and geoff mentioned that volume purchases by Derudedog-9/6/1998
1862 jim - please take the time to respond to what I actually said, as I value yourrudedog-9/6/1998
1861 Dog and Geoff, Re:Good question. I would like to hear Jim speak to this, but ljim kelley-9/5/1998
1860 Michelle, I do not know how to answer your question. I am not sure if you are jim kelley-9/5/1998
1859 Rudedog - <i>If CPQ knows in advance when CPU prices will fall, why wouldGeoff Nunn-9/5/1998
1858 Hi Jim, What is your background in forecasting can I ask? Is this stuff you reLizzie Tudor-9/5/1998
1857 Hi rudedog; It is pretty clear that trying to explain the details of how invenBilow-9/5/1998
1856 Dog, You must think that INTC is stupid or lazy. Real demand is more importajim kelley-9/5/1998
1855 Dog, Forecasting demand is a huge problem for companies like CPQ which use an jim kelley-9/5/1998
1854 Thanks rudedog for clearing up my confusion. I did not think about network conndivvie-9/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):