The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

An SI Board Since July 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
3029	28	0

Emcee: sandintoes	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1879	I don't think there is any official formal performance ratings. They can&	TimF	-	1/12/2007
1878	<I> Nobody has argued that the 9th Amendment rights, whatever they may be,	TimF	-	1/12/2007
1877	Who gives these guys their performance ratings? The Chief Justice? Or do they	ManyMoose	-	1/11/2007
1876	Roberts' Rules In an exclusive interview, Chief Justice John Roberts says t	Tom Clarke	-	1/11/2007
1875	Critical review of Justice Breyer's "Active Liberty" by Judge Mich	TimF	-	12/29/2006
1874	Any opinions about this? constitution.org (link found at Message 23062428 )	TimF	-	12/13/2006
1873	Scalia and Breyer Debate: Justices Scalia and Breyer recently sat down with Jan	TimF	-	12/8/2006
1872	Nobody has argued that the 9th Amendment rights, whatever they may be, are enfor	D. Long	-	12/7/2006
1871	At least one of the responses to that post mentions the 9th amendment as a suppo	TimF	-	12/7/2006
1870	Activism ain't just a river in Egypt Last spring, I got into a heated argum	TimF	-	12/7/2006
1869	There is something to be said for gridlock. One of my friends has expressed the	Glenn Petersen	-	12/7/2006
1868	Congress passing fewer laws? News to me, but if true it's a step in the ri	ManyMoose	-	12/7/2006
1867	<b>Case of the Dwindling Docket Mystifies the Supreme Court</b> Dec	Glenn Petersen	-	12/7/2006
1866	Here's where the rubber meets the road. The Democrats will prove beyond all	ManyMoose	-	11/12/2006
1865	Bush's judicial selections are probably going to be a huge source of content	Glenn Petersen	-	11/12/2006
1864	While the House is probably gone, it is very important for the GOP to retain con	Glenn Petersen	-	10/28/2006
1863	Great example, I see the difference. The first stop in the first sentence does c	Tom Clarke	-	10/23/2006
1862	Like they say, the old liberal judges are hanging on hoping for another Clinton.	sandintoes	-	10/23/2006
1861	New appointments are only a step. We need to slap down the Imperial Judiciary, w	CYBERKEN	-	10/22/2006
1860	Good point..that gives the courts way too much power.	sandintoes	-	10/22/2006
1859	I am proposing that with current technology, the only reason a word WOULD be dif	CYBERKEN	-	10/22/2006
1858	But if they do that, and later down the line, the wording was wrong according to	sandintoes	-	10/22/2006
1857	I think it's the pseudo "friendlies" who are sabotaging many key i	CYBERKEN	-	10/22/2006
1856	But if lawyers are using an apostrophe to change the meaning of the law, then so	sandintoes	-	10/21/2006
1855	<i>That I do not get, how can that possibly be?</i> It's simple	D. Long	-	10/21/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):