CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3391	10	0	CSGI

Emcee: PETE DARRUDA	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1891	SOME MORE EVIDENCE >> GOSH! All these Fortune 500 Co.s must be too STUPI	tech	-	1/4/1998
1890	David, <i> >> I believe that these percentages represent the relati	tech	-	1/4/1998
1889	Tech - <i>2. Are there any numbers that show the percentages that est. h	David Eddy	-	1/4/1998
1888	humbly respond Joe, most people know why I <b>have to</b> repeat m	tech	-	1/4/1998
1887	Humbly report, tech, most people know exactly why you keep repeating yourself -	Josef Svejk	-	1/4/1998
1886	Hey Joe, Thanks for the award, but wait until the game is over before you star	tech	-	1/4/1998
1885	Humbly report, tech, TADAAAA - I believe you are the WINNER: sdplastics.com M	Josef Svejk	-	1/4/1998
1884	Now you are posting false information about me. <i> >> And my poin	tech	-	1/4/1998
1883	Mr. Hansens views countered one by one. 1.<i> >> Bollinger bands a	tech	-	1/4/1998
1882	>> GOSH! All these Fortune 500 Co.s must be too STUPID << <i>	tech	-	1/4/1998
1881	tech wrote: <<technically, it is pretty easy to call it from here.	Trader X	-	1/4/1998
1880	Tech wrote: <<Now compare this with the Now compare this with the body sh	Trader X	-	1/4/1998
1879	Exactly right David...you'd have to be a FOOL to believe the PR. And my po	Trader X	-	1/4/1998
1878	GOSH! All these Fortune 500 Co.s must be too STUPID to choose CSGI, huh? Compa	Trader X	-	1/4/1998
1877	>> you did hit it dead on when you said the mkt. makers (and/or large sh	tech	-	1/4/1998
1876	David, back to a subject that I don't think we came to a conclusion on. A	tech	-	1/4/1998
1875	>> Excuse me!!!! Such blatant company PR cannot go unchallenged! <<	tech	-	1/4/1998
1874	David: Re: 350,000 times it works, and then BLAMMO ... Intermittent abnormal b	TEDennis	-	1/3/1998
1873	TED - <i>What? You mean that there are firms out there claiming 100% acc	David Eddy	-	1/3/1998
1872	David: >>These systems are simply too big & complex for anyone to be	TEDennis	-	1/3/1998
1871	Tech - Excuse me!!!! Such blatant company PR cannot go unchallenged! <i>	David Eddy	-	1/3/1998
1870	Tech - <i>The problem, said Kane, is that <b>''98 percent	David Eddy	-	1/3/1998
1869	And here we thought you weren't the CSGI PR guy. >>although there wil	feltburner	-	1/3/1998
1868	The truly automated solution - The fundamental feature of the patent-	tech	-	1/3/1998
1867	98% Accuracy Will Not Suffice, Says Banker Link: sfgate.com The need for	tech	-	1/2/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):