SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Am.United Global, Inc. (AUGI)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2065 5 0 AUGI
Emcee:  eugenic1 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
190 Now it looks like 9.75 Bid, 10.00 Ask. The NASDAQ must be getting creamed agaiCraig Stevenson-6/26/1996
189 Stock was down to 10 1/4 this morning and has since rebounded nicely. Its hard JinChong Wu-6/26/1996
188 Try CSCO and COHR, I consider them to be relatively stable (except for COHR, whMarshall-6/26/1996
187 To All: What postings have info about the UPS tracking software. ThanksRobert Northington-6/26/1996
186 Since the stock price is in the denominator, that would actually have the opposCraig Stevenson-6/26/1996
185 Connectsoft in the news... unfortunately it isn't a big deal, doesn't dchris431-6/26/1996
184 Hi Michelle! Yes, it has been somewhat of a news (or lack of it yet) stock latMarshall-6/26/1996
183 We know if we plugged the numbers into this formula it would produce a high numMarshall-6/25/1996
182 You might be right about a DOW decline not hurting the NASDAQ too badly, as lonCraig Stevenson-6/25/1996
181 Actually the NASDAQ should fare pretty well should a DOW correction come unlessMarshall-6/25/1996
180 So they will reduce our shareholder value to ALMOST zero, but won't actuallCraig Stevenson-6/25/1996
179 I thought the ranking would be higher too. Maybe the next time it is updated, Craig Stevenson-6/25/1996
178 On the NASDAQ question: No. Its kind of like calculus where the number just appMarshall-6/25/1996
177 On those criteria of rating, I know we have to look outstanding on the first onMarshall-6/25/1996
176 Hi John A couple of quick comments!!! 1) I think that maybe some might wBob Lee-6/25/1996
175 I have to Agree Jin, the chart looks good, i watch the trading daily and these john Kurisko-6/25/1996
174 Chart looks good. Down today on low volume (and NASDAQ down 10 pts). EverythingJinChong Wu-6/25/1996
172 When the NASDAQ gets to zero, do they start using negative numbers? <g>Craig Stevenson-6/25/1996
171 That's what I thought too. I was surprised that the fundamental ranking waCraig Stevenson-6/25/1996
170 All they're upset about is that 3COM (COMS) met estimates and appearantly eMarshall-6/25/1996
169 All, My computer has been down all day and I just got it back up...and haven&#chris431-6/25/1996
168 Those figures all sound excellent, but the funny one is the fundamentals. I wMarshall-6/25/1996
167 I forgot to mention it earlier, but I have access to an information service thaCraig Stevenson-6/25/1996
166 Yes, the market looks a little jittery to me too. I have been trying to find aCraig Stevenson-6/25/1996
165 Boy, this market is nervous waiting for the releases, then again it may just beMarshall-6/25/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):