SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
190 It may be sales by those selling stockholders described in Nov98 shelf registra5,17,37,5,101,...-1/10/1999
189 does anyone know what produced the selling pressure in December? The following CPAMarty-1/9/1999
188 QuietWon, I agree with your assessment that 1999 will be a good one for small 5,17,37,5,101,...-1/8/1999
187 I would not call myself an expert in theis stock or in technical analysis for tCPAMarty-1/8/1999
186 QuietWon, thanks for the explanation of the PR, i know about the accounting angCPAMarty-1/8/1999
185 IMCL has # prods in pipeline- u get cancer drugs,C225,etc and even get a stem-cQuietWon-1/8/1999
184 That sounds right. At least that has been my experience in the past on other bJEB-1/8/1999
183 Marty, you've been watching the stock I presume and expert on it's moveQuietWon-1/8/1999
182 JEB, artcl I read said 50% of biotech stk's move comes after Phase III apprQuietWon-1/8/1999
181 1999 is the year for biotechs. That's why I target this group. These nextJEB-1/8/1999
180 I like how they have 2 drugs currently in phase III trials. I still have some JEB-1/8/1999
179 Also, NY Times article May1/97 in front of me of treatmts for cancer and how thQuietWon-1/8/1999
178 JEB, I defer to your expert knowledge on biotechs, I like that the compound is QuietWon-1/8/1999
177 Hi QW, The MRK deal is what really attracts me to this stock. It leans heavilJEB-1/8/1999
176 Marty, let me explain. First, the 19.9% cap is very likely b/c of ownership resQuietWon-1/8/1999
175 here is a PR dated 12/15/98 imclone.com does anyone know how the premium in thCPAMarty-1/7/1999
174 this stock would look even better from a TA perspective if it breaks the downtrCPAMarty-1/7/1999
173 Chairman bot 10,000 shs just below $8 lateNov/early Dec - stock's low only QuietWon-1/7/1999
172 Marty, I concur with your TA. Looks interesting. Cancer compound similar to anoQuietWon-1/7/1999
171 a bullish sign, crossing the 50 and 200 day averages dailystocks.com CPAMarty-1/5/1999
170 Yes, I've read that. But I seem to remember reading that C225 had a taxol e5,17,37,5,101,...-1/4/1999
169 Jackson, have a look at IMCL's web site for a description of how C255 is ustnsaf-1/3/1999
168 I was waiting for someone to take issue with that statement. I vaguely remember5,17,37,5,101,...-1/2/1999
167 I came across this thread while looking for treatments for pancreatic cancer. tnsaf-1/1/1999
166 Thanks, Marty, re. short interest. I guess this means on the one hand that theDaniel Shaffer-12/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News