SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Bio Technology General - BTGC
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2028 28 0 BTGC
Emcee:  Lee Goodman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1903 Check out the first bullet point on his website - ctsl.com . Also look at the Pete Mimmack-7/22/1999
1902 Fine, any facts to support Your opinions? <eom>Pete Mimmack-7/22/1999
1901 < Not a bad return for 3 weeks on BTGC since I bought in at $7.> Me tDiogeron-7/22/1999
1900 Who made the claim of 30% over 10 years. I don' think it's accurate.vibaby-7/22/1999
1899 I've been observing him over the last 10 years, not the last month, he sucvibaby-7/22/1999
1898 Please post your proof @ Murphy. As far as I'm concerned he's been righHoodBuilder-7/21/1999
1897 Details? I know that his California Tech Stock Letter has returned over 30% a Pete Mimmack-7/21/1999
1896 << his advice is very impressive>> BS! He's been wrong so covibaby-7/21/1999
1895 Not that it was the only cause but Michael Murphy's Technology Newsletter hHoodBuilder-7/21/1999
1894 OK...So we once again get the quarterly bump up in share price around earningsFrancis S. Patrick-7/21/1999
1893 G'day Ram & all - I don't think buyout is in the work at this pointBosco-7/21/1999
1892 Long overdue price action on this undervalued stock! If they get bought out, hoRam Seetharaman-7/21/1999
1891 Rather amazing move the past few days on really strong volume. Just moved to 10Dave O.-7/21/1999
1890 G'day Slugger & all - it was the only gainer for me yesterday. And techBosco-7/21/1999
1889 Up a half point today on twice the daily average volume, something's up. LSlugger-7/20/1999
1888 Hi Michael - thanks. Admittedly, I ve spent too little time to track this invesBosco-7/16/1999
1887 Sorry, missed your question. Management has mentioned several times in the lasMichael G. Potter-7/16/1999
1886 hi Michael - thx for the reply, but you miss my question. I understand the hedgBosco-7/16/1999
1885 If you study what happens to a stock when a company announces an acquisition, yMichael G. Potter-7/16/1999
1884 G'day all - hi Michael, you sez "If anything, I can see the stock goinBosco-7/16/1999
1883 Did anyone listen in on the conference call? Is there a replay? I'm long Michael G. Potter-7/16/1999
1882 < The curious thing is that the stock has been in a recovery mode in the paDave O.-7/14/1999
1881 I don't see the earnings report as negative at all. Sure, it's down a Elvis Jones-7/14/1999
1880 G'day all - well, I wouldn't want to use the dramatic word 'tankBosco-7/14/1999
1879 Earnings are out .10 / share: biz.yahoo.com This seems to be much above the .Michael G. Potter-7/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News