SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1914I believe the gig is up on Veritas. It's fundamentals will never support thchomolungma-8/3/2000
1913Here is a snippet from SSB which was posted on the EXBT board. I believe it is aZ Analyzer-8/2/2000
1912The July 2000 issue of Insight (IDEMA) has a must read article, excerpted below.Gus-8/1/2000
1911<<So I'm not sure if the theory of postponing the details by SEG managZ Analyzer-7/31/2000
1910Thread- Well this is interesting. I wanted to go back and find the exact date thMikeM54321-7/31/2000
1909Luczo was smart to hold the vote so long after the announcement. By the time of Z Analyzer-7/31/2000
1908Thread- I thought someone had posted this previously on this thread, but I can&#MikeM54321-7/29/2000
1907<<P.S. What do you think about HTCH's report? They say they will be inTom Simpson-7/23/2000
1906<<but you wonder if they feel any guilt>> No, I've not a shred oTom Simpson-7/23/2000
1905Tom- Funny!<lol> ... Wouldn't you like to be in the head of one of theMikeM54321-7/21/2000
1904I'm saying we would surely volunteer for vulture duty if we could :o) Of couTom Simpson-7/21/2000
1903<i>"if you or I WERE prospective stockholders of New Seagate (which lMikeM54321-7/21/2000
1902<<No, except for employees and prospective stockholders of the New SeagateTom Simpson-7/21/2000
1901<i>"Anyone have another and/or better reason for checking the "FMikeM54321-7/20/2000
1900<<It seems to me that the single reason a stockholder would vote yes on thSam-7/20/2000
1899<<However, it looks like there may be another little shakeout of high PSR Tom Simpson-7/20/2000
1898Mark, <<What could they possibly offer institutions that could make up forSam-7/19/2000
1897Sam - The SEC could have some concern about the SEG deal if SEG was misleading,Mark Madden-7/19/2000
1896Thread- Remember to vote NO if we ever get our proxies. I'm sure SEG managemMikeM54321-7/18/2000
1895Stitch and thread, Masochist that I am, I went back to reread some of the posts Sam-7/17/2000
1894Seagate and Compaq get sued for $800 million: embeddedtechnology.com{0E93F5ED-5Starlight-7/17/2000
1893Mike, Yes, I do recall the reply you got from the SEC. I guess it will have to bSam-7/17/2000
1892Sam- Thanks for digging that up. I just cannot believe this has happened either.MikeM54321-7/14/2000
1891You know, every time I read more of this proxy statement, I get shocked by sometSam-7/14/2000
1890With Seagate trading at just under 64, and Veritas at just over 136, there is quSam-7/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News