SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1921Re: "Why oh why is the Grand Old Party so against to the lawfully allowed mWindsock-11/11/2000
1920Why is Al Gore, the acknowledged candidate of a major political party, not allowTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1919Apparently there are three types of punches that get counted for the first time Ilaine-11/11/2000
1918I'm not playing ignorant. The problem isn't in those other counties andTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1917So you're saying because Al Gore fought and it added time to this precious eTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1916Dear Carolyn, in our lifetime, we have never had this close of an election...thiTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1915No. 1, you're not reasonable, and of course I'm partial...I want someonesandintoes-11/11/2000
1914I am not an expert in election law, and I have not seen the Petition for InjunctIlaine-11/11/2000
1913Because everyone knew that Clinton could not run again. That known fact would inCarolyn-11/11/2000
1912Gore is not in Clinton's league, on that I agree with you. What I find odd TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1911Don't play ignorant. You have displayed a lot of thoughtfulness before the eCarolyn-11/11/2000
1910>>What's this advantage BS?<< By the time the Dems requested a Paul Moerman-11/11/2000
1909Democratic spin. How often in a Presidential election has this occurred?Carolyn-11/11/2000
1908Clinton, to those who have met him, has incredible charisma and intelligence. I Carolyn-11/11/2000
1907Are you saying that Gore doesn't have the right to request a manual recount TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1906The Democrats requested this recount because a. the vote differential was razor TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1905Why is it foolish to request a manual recount in a state with 6million votes casTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1904I'll tell you something. LBJ and Harry Truman were quite similar. Bill CliTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1903Look who is using it.Carolyn-11/11/2000
1902I know. But it is strange that Gore disputed the vote in Florida from the very Carolyn-11/11/2000
1901What's this advantage BS? The Republicans could just as easily requested maTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1900Carolyn--You can't be serious. Are you saying that it's OK for Bush to TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1899<I>Of course, they are going to look foolish requesting a manual recount rsandintoes-11/11/2000
1898By the same token, Is LBJ like Harry Truman? Is Bill Clinton like Jimmy CarterCarolyn-11/11/2000
1897Ronald Reagan was president from jan 1981 to jan 1989, not 1980 to 1988 TGTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1896>>Of course, they are going to look foolish requesting a manual recount riPaul Moerman-11/11/2000
1895A chad is the punch that doesn't get fully discharged from the ballot. Are TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1894And Republicans are certainly entitled to request a recount in those other countTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1893Carolyn--I was only 13 years old when the Civil Rights Act was passed, but I watTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1892Yes, no one got killed and I believe they ultimately became friends. JFK's TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1891Yes, signed by an honest man. Then abused by a dishonest one.Carolyn-11/11/2000
1890<<some are arguing that hand counting is more reliable because it allows tTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1889Well, let's put it this way. Some of the Republican Senators from the SouthTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1888Looking at your numbers Im beginning to feel sorry for you. Start here>>Vendit™-11/11/2000
1887<i>Reagan Administration was 1981-1989</i> Nope...........1980 thrVendit™-11/11/2000
1886How many times can the Democrats demand a recount? Until they win, through reapsandintoes-11/11/2000
1885What is your reasoning? EOMmoosebeary-11/11/2000
1884Democracies survive because they can change. < No one subscribes to the compak.ramesh-11/11/2000
1883Right here, my friend. senate.gov Reagan Administration was 1981-1989. United jttmab-11/11/2000
1882Thanks for the History lesson <gg> and thanks for making my point .. <Triffin-11/11/2000
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News