SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Valley Group
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2946 26 0 SVGI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1946 Cymer had abandoned their F2 program, because few in the industry thought F2 waFJB-1/31/1999
1945 Bob, do you know why SVGI plans on using a Lambda Physik laser? <i>Lambdorkrious-1/31/1999
1944 thx, Steve for the info - i've learned somethingQuietWon-1/30/1999
1943 Hi Steve, Did you read the papers on gate oxides presented at IEDM? How thick FJB-1/30/1999
1942 I'm not Katherine, but let me make some comments anyway: <i>eg. GaAsArtslaw-1/30/1999
1941 wow, katherine, you know your stuff! can you answer the following: from what QuietWon-1/30/1999
1940 It's always interesting to see how different people see the same events. I Katherine Derbyshire-1/30/1999
1939 All SVG is claiming is that they'll be able to print 0.03 micron features iKatherine Derbyshire-1/30/1999
1938 More info on SVGI roadmap. eet.comFJB-1/30/1999
1937 SVGI will be 20+ soon. Ram Seetharaman-1/27/1999
1936 SVGL just announced the MicrascanIV: biz.yahoo.com They also announced that tRitz-1/27/1999
1935 KLIC has similar market cap as SVGI (near 500+ million). KLIC has a profit margRam Seetharaman-1/26/1999
1934 I have been tracking a bunch of semi equipment stocks. Something is going on wSparky65-1/26/1999
1933 Is this move due to intels news about .18micron?? Daniel Simon-1/26/1999
1932 at one time 1µ was thought to be the limit for optical lithography. TechIan@SI-1/23/1999
1931 Ian, my understanding was, for commercial purposes, .06u was the theoretical/stQuietWon-1/23/1999
1930 Did anyone listen to the conference call? I'd be particularly interested iJuniper-1/20/1999
1929 Earnings: biz.yahoo.comScott Brooks-1/19/1999
1928 Interesting snippet from an SBN article... The reason for the Tinsley acquisitIan@SI-1/16/1999
1927 Based on AAII Journal January 1999, Volume xxi, No.1, page 4 comparative analysRam Seetharaman-1/15/1999
1926 Jay, If I remember correctly, building the optics system associated with the MIan@SI-1/12/1999
1925 I am looking at the 1-1-99, Summary of Advices and Index - The Value Line InvesRam Seetharaman-1/12/1999
1924 Ian, or anyone else, looking at the 10k, virtually all of the book value is inorkrious-1/12/1999
1923 You are right - short term - things are slow & uncertain - but by the end oRam Seetharaman-1/11/1999
1922 If you check the most recent 10K, you'll see the list of 6 leading chipmakeIan@SI-1/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News