SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19482But will Qatar let us use it to attack another Arab state? We also need real esLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19481<i>So do you want to give white collar criminals half way decent conditionLane3-8/19/2002
19480Yep.jlallen-8/19/2002
19479Qatar....mainly because we just finished building a humungous airbase there.... jlallen-8/19/2002
19478Oops. Sorry for the repeat. I haven't been reading and because it came in E-8/19/2002
19477So who do you trust? The NY Times wants to sell papers. Fox wants viewers. NoLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19476Need? No. Desirable? Yes. Give "allies" a veto over advancing US natjlallen-8/19/2002
19475Not just the US public. Other nations too. In particular close allies like BriLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19474Why do you think Qatar will allow us to use their real estate? The recent defecLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19473LOL! I like it! I have the feeling you, I, and Bill are going to be the only oLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19472<i>The political will for leveling cities just isn't there: we have toLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19471LOL! Message 17894964 Bridge Player beat you to it. See this by Karen? MessaLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19470<i>The National Education Association is suggesting to teachers that they Lazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19469washtimes.com Excerpt: <i> The National Education Association is sugE-8/19/2002
19468Technically, because Saddam is in violation of the armistice agreements I think jlallen-8/19/2002
19467I've got to agree with that. Leaving Congress out of the loop in matters ofLazarus_Long-8/19/2002
19466NEA delivers history lesson By Ellen Sorokin THE WASHINGTON TIMES The NaBridge Player-8/19/2002
19465<i>So maybe we should decide whether we're going to do the job or not.Dayuhan-8/19/2002
19464Very interesting, thanks. I suspect they are on a wild goose chase, and that oneNeocon-8/19/2002
19463<i>So just where DID all that whining about coddling white collar crooks iLane3-8/18/2002
19462But What's The Legal Case For Preemption? By Bruce Ackerman Sunday, August Lane3-8/18/2002
19461I hope you watched the McLaughlin Group on Islam today. John had 4 Arabs today tIsh-8/18/2002
19460THAT would be interesting if viable. I wonder just how much real control they hLazarus_Long-8/18/2002
19459If the US is not willing to do whatever it takes to fight and win a war in Iraq,Lazarus_Long-8/18/2002
19458I saw some news recently that the Kurds in northern Iraq have offered to host ouLane3-8/18/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News