SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
198073 1047 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
195156<i>US strong-arms TSMC to save Intel</i> Come on. A much better soElroy18/8/2025
195155Does this company have a CEO or a Board of Directors?Srat Man-8/8/2025
195154Your Gemini query did not represent the years in my assessment. I started with 2Close to Retirement68/8/2025
195153 US strong-arms TSMC to save Intel by NBill Wolf18/8/2025
195152Qualcomm wants Wi-Fi 8 to work when everything goes wrong by Nick Farrell on08 ABill Wolf38/8/2025
195151GR8, re: “no respect”..........................................................Jim Mullens-8/7/2025
195150Close, re: QCOM Growth .........................................................Jim Mullens38/7/2025
195149This semiconductor play with a solid dividend ‘gets no respect’ but could be dueGR8FORM48/7/2025
195148J. -- The 5% rule is an SEC regulation requiring anyone exceeding 5% ownership mArt Bechhoefer-8/7/2025
195147Hopefully Q won’t bent over for a 2029 agreement. Needs to be longer given 6G (2manning1818/7/2025
195146Maybe the low p/e and low share price is because of stagnate revenue growth: 202Close to Retirement68/7/2025
195145" it would take at least a 5% position, up or down, to make a significant dmatherandlowell88/7/2025
195144Are they directly manipulating the stock..... no.... are they influencing influeOptntrdr199978/7/2025
195143J and all -- It's not clear that Apple has taken any direct actions against Art Bechhoefer38/7/2025
195142" so either they need to execute quickly ..... or we need a new pitchman tomatherandlowell-8/7/2025
195141Bye Bye Lip-Bu? Could Cristiano be next? :-) reuters.comjazzcat200048/7/2025
195140TSMC, Samsung Stocks Gain. Why Trump’s Chips Tariff Isn’t as Scary as It Seems. Bill Wolf48/7/2025
195139Will CA be in the president's cross-hairs soon? Will Lisa? Will Huang? How asbfm-8/7/2025
195138Taiwan said its leading chip manufacturer TSMC will not have to pay a 100% tarifBill Wolf68/7/2025
195137it really does NOT affect QCOM. Name any phone or device manufacturer in the USAengineer28/6/2025
195136it is way far easier to take out parts from a known design than it is to add theengineer58/6/2025
195135It all comes down to successful execution. Successful execution means multiple esbfm18/6/2025
195134I think the result of a 100% tariff on chips made by companies without a US pressbfm18/6/2025
195133The fundamental problem with the stock is.... current management is transitioninOptntrdr199938/6/2025
195132Tim Apple a day keeps the tariffs away: Apple announces additional $100 billion GR8FORM18/6/2025
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):