SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
197016 1035 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
195156<i>US strong-arms TSMC to save Intel</i> Come on. A much better soElroy1August 8
195155Does this company have a CEO or a Board of Directors?Srat Man-August 8
195154Your Gemini query did not represent the years in my assessment. I started with 2Close to Retirement6August 8
195153 US strong-arms TSMC to save Intel by NBill Wolf1August 8
195152Qualcomm wants Wi-Fi 8 to work when everything goes wrong by Nick Farrell on08 ABill Wolf3August 8
195151GR8, re: “no respect”..........................................................Jim Mullens-August 7
195150Close, re: QCOM Growth .........................................................Jim Mullens3August 7
195149This semiconductor play with a solid dividend ‘gets no respect’ but could be dueGR8FORM4August 7
195148J. -- The 5% rule is an SEC regulation requiring anyone exceeding 5% ownership mArt Bechhoefer-August 7
195147Hopefully Q won’t bent over for a 2029 agreement. Needs to be longer given 6G (2manning181August 7
195146Maybe the low p/e and low share price is because of stagnate revenue growth: 202Close to Retirement6August 7
195145" it would take at least a 5% position, up or down, to make a significant dmatherandlowell8August 7
195144Are they directly manipulating the stock..... no.... are they influencing influeOptntrdr19997August 7
195143J and all -- It's not clear that Apple has taken any direct actions against Art Bechhoefer3August 7
195142" so either they need to execute quickly ..... or we need a new pitchman tomatherandlowell-August 7
195141Bye Bye Lip-Bu? Could Cristiano be next? :-) reuters.comjazzcat20004August 7
195140TSMC, Samsung Stocks Gain. Why Trump’s Chips Tariff Isn’t as Scary as It Seems. Bill Wolf4August 7
195139Will CA be in the president's cross-hairs soon? Will Lisa? Will Huang? How asbfm-August 7
195138Taiwan said its leading chip manufacturer TSMC will not have to pay a 100% tarifBill Wolf6August 7
195137it really does NOT affect QCOM. Name any phone or device manufacturer in the USAengineer2August 6
195136it is way far easier to take out parts from a known design than it is to add theengineer5August 6
195135It all comes down to successful execution. Successful execution means multiple esbfm1August 6
195134I think the result of a 100% tariff on chips made by companies without a US pressbfm1August 6
195133The fundamental problem with the stock is.... current management is transitioninOptntrdr19993August 6
195132Tim Apple a day keeps the tariffs away: Apple announces additional $100 billion GR8FORM1August 6
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News