SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Dawson Science (DWSC)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
397 2 0 DWSC
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
197 Zeev- Thanks for sharing the information provided in posts #193/195 JW@KSCJW@KSC-5/25/1997
196 >>"smoke and mirrors"<< Zeev I fully understand that theJW@KSC-5/25/1997
195 John it is very risky business and I am not going to do what I am going to mentZeev Hed-5/25/1997
194 Zeev: So, a question--can this stock be played (carefully) on the hype to makeJohn A. Paul-5/25/1997
193 John: Yes, it was Superstock that got my attention to DWSC. ZeevZeev Hed-5/25/1997
192 Zeev: Thanks for the look. By the way, did you hear from "Superstocks&quJohn A. Paul-5/25/1997
191 Zeev: I see your logic now. Thanks. Razor PS - Looks like you're headinRazorbak-5/25/1997
190 Jim: Let us assume that all these numbers are correct. So Dawson is selling at Zeev Hed-5/25/1997
189 Hi Sam and any reading. I have had some more time to go over the situation hekee-5/25/1997
188 Two Words : Promoters/Owners See Post 1.kee-5/25/1997
187 You as well as everyone else reading this thread know I have not accused anyoneRay Juliano-5/25/1997
186 Juliano ACCUSES one of the posters on the thread. Juliano says<b> "kee-5/25/1997
185 I want to apologize to all about this, but "kee" doesn't have theRay Juliano-5/24/1997
184 This $100,000 figure keeps popping up and seems to come from some very flawed lJeffery E. Forrest-5/24/1997
183 I clearly said. "this thread is pure hype and is being pushed by electronkee-5/24/1997
182 You did not answer my question to you.Ray Juliano-5/24/1997
181 "It appears to me" That this is exactly the kind of response given bkee-5/24/1997
180 Jim You leave out some very important facts: Perhaps you are right about the kee-5/24/1997
179 Whoa! I'm not sure I've learned anything about investing or this compaMGee-5/24/1997
178 Kee, perhaps you should reread your original post. Less than 10 people had poRay Juliano-5/24/1997
177 >> I don't care one way or the other because I would never BUY this sJW@KSC-5/24/1997
176 [kee] ******** THIS ONE IS FOR EVERYONE ELSE TOO ********* JW@KSC This startedJW@KSC-5/24/1997
175 Better read it again Scrappy, you got it all backwards. JEF assumed something,kee-5/24/1997
174 [>>"wild speculation" money is better spent in cheap options.&lJW@KSC-5/24/1997
173 >>Can't we just ignore him.<< 1)Try it again now...ignore! 2)Scrapps-5/24/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News