SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
198053 1047 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
197352Copiilot - My Four-Hour Ordeal Yesterday -- Now there are TWO COPILOT veJim Mullens2January 25
197351Wall street doesn't care about the long term. Much more money to be made hewaitwatchwander1January 24
197350all good things - and i generally agree with what you found.... but and here is Optntrdr19997January 24
197349and wall street is saying - well - you didnt meet your forecasts in 2020... we dOptntrdr19995January 24
197348I've been thinking about Amon as Qualcomm's CEO. My initial take is he waitwatchwander3January 24
197347Op99- re: QCOM revenue………………………………………………........................................Jim Mullens1January 24
197346can we be realistic with that - at a minimum they should have to by 10,000 sharOptntrdr19991January 24
197345better yet to become a board members they are required to buy a minimum of signimanning18-January 24
197344another - look at what we are doing statement - not a look at how much we are maOptntrdr199911January 24
197343Cristiano Amon on the Big Technology Podcast, discussing his work with OpenAI onLittlefishyfish1January 24
197342another click bate headline - when qcom pushes the tax adjustment back to where Optntrdr19992January 24
197341Qualcomm CEO pockets 15% pay rise as profits fall 45% Carly PageFri 23 Jan 2026 GR8FORM2January 23
197340That makes sense and also good to hear that the judge is taking command. With Awaitwatchwander3January 23
197339If all the parties requested a delay of the trial date, my guess is that settlemhedgefund2January 23
197338Regarding the case I bought the transcript. There were just too many outstandingQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN13January 23
197337How often have we seen Qualcomm partner with a corporate entity only to see the waitwatchwander4January 23
197336His words on the last cc were: We're excited about what we're doing. ThWildbiftek-January 23
197335Oh yes, my mistake. The posted minutes were for the status meeting. I also nowwaitwatchwander1January 23
197334I agree, Amon talks about all about the future stuff -- but he did that in 2020 QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN4January 23
197333there is a scheduling and status meeting in 2 weeks and something else in March Optntrdr1999-January 23
197332This issue as to which entity is the proper defendant suggests an effort ARM to hedgefund-January 23
197331OT: It sure looked obvious that $50 was going to be problematic for Intel'swaitwatchwander-January 23
197330You might be right. However, the wait for our day in court just got extended 6 waitwatchwander-January 23
197329until "opportunties" become real countable revenue and earnings - we aOptntrdr19996January 23
197328TII Announces Strategic Collaboration with Qualcomm................ CopilotJim Mullens1January 23
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):