Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

An SI Board Since June 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
198060	1047	8	QCOM

Emcee: Silcon Observer	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
197377	Tan got lucky - he aggregated a lot of parts that happened to fit into AI	Optntrdr1999	-	January 26
197376	"Tan wanted QCOM" I think you, as some others, are missing my point e	aryl	3	January 26
197375	UBS maintains Qualcomm at Neutral and lowers the price target from $185 to $160.	GR8FORM	2	January 26
197374	A very good point, but: 1) While the lawsuits are a threat on the surface, they	Wildbiftek	4	January 26
197373	I don't mind hearing all stories. I'm just saying it's rarely clear	waitwatchwander	1	January 26
197372	I too immediately thought of Lisa Su. She took on both Nvidia and Intel but in	waitwatchwander	-	January 26
197371	Tan wanted qcom and would have "easily settled the issues with AAPL" .	Optntrdr1999	1	January 26
197370	Well that's certainly the +ve side of it all. The -ve would have to be that	waitwatchwander	-	January 26
197369	It sounds like you'd be happier if you weren't invested here or maybe yo	A.J. Mullen	3	January 26
197368	Sbfm, re: the street’s QCOM expectations ………………………………………….. Add- QCOM remains	Jim Mullens	1	January 26
197367	Dr. Lisa Su also comes to mind. She crushed INTC and like Huang, strategically f	FrankHamer	10	January 26
197366	Gemini on the Two Copilot change……..........................................…………	Jim Mullens	2	January 26
197365	my opinion is... this is just a plant to distract the fact that there is a grand	Optntrdr1999	4	January 26
197364	Qualcomm CEO pockets 15% pay rise as profits fall 45% Cristiano Amon took home	Bill Wolf	1	January 26
197363	Mizuho goes from 175 to 160. These downgrades show no confidence in the upcomin	sbfm	-	January 26
197362	Yes, that's another take on this matter. It sounds like you'd be happie	waitwatchwander	-	January 26
197361	answer : $.	Jon Koplik	-	January 26
197360	If QCOM has such good will among its partners why is it plagued with law suits y	aryl	6	January 26
197359	Yes, that's true, but I wasn't actually referring to the buyout, just th	aryl	3	January 25
197358	We wouldn't be shareholders. Cash buyout, if memory serves me.	JGoren	1	January 25
197357	Motley: Billionaire David Tepper Sells Oracle, Micron, and Intel, and Buys an AI	GR8FORM	8	January 25
197356	I don't believe that to be the case. Tan would have milked the patents and	waitwatchwander	6	January 25
197355	there are many factories which are so auotmated they run themselves. tsmc fab is	engineer	4	January 25
197354	[bluesky] USA: We cannot compete cheap Chinese production workers. China: Xiaom	waitwatchwander	1	January 25
197353	Does anyone think if either Hock Tan or Jensen Huang had been the CEO of QCOM fo	aryl	3	January 25

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):