Imclone systems (IMCL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2515	89	0	IMCL

Emcee: Deeber	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1990	Must read from Yahoo! IMCL board... messages.yahoo.com Looks pretty convincing	The Fox	-	2/10/2002
1989	In the local Austin newspaper there is the story of a Mrs. Topfer who had pancre	dwight martin	-	2/10/2002
1988	I agree with you that the critical issue is whether IMCL adequately addressed th	Fred Levine	-	2/10/2002
1987	Biotechs will be in tougher situation to negotiate, they will be trusted less, t	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1986	Thanks Waskal brothers....just what the biotechs need.. "February 8, 2002	Arthur Radley	-	2/9/2002
1985	Tumor shrinkage is a good indicator of efficacy, precisely that was the goal acc	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1984	What you said is correct; that survival rates are a long-term (5 yrs) variable.	Fred Levine	-	2/9/2002
1983	sam wants to date new artist J... Jail-O	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1982	Fred, Why is the original RTF not published by Imcl? Why did sam do not deny th	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1981	Fred Levine: 360,000 pages of data were submitted to the FDA from Imcl about the	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1980	telep, the super HYPE case of the young woman at best is anecdote (the lowest le	Cacaito	-	2/9/2002
1979	Please give me the basis for your information that the drug is ineffective. I h	Fred Levine	-	2/9/2002
1978	The case that started Erbitux was a young woman with colon cancer that failed to	telephonics	-	2/9/2002
1977	Lack of side effects is a very bad reason to accept an ineffective unproven drug	Cacaito	-	2/8/2002
1976	Not a single life was saved in Imcl trial data send to FDA. Imcl did not even t	Cacaito	-	2/8/2002
1975	I have a different spin on this, perhaps because I did some outcome research.	Fred Levine	-	2/8/2002
1974	Trouble is that BMY itself has had a problematic record with FDA. I wouldn'	Ibexx	-	2/8/2002
1973	It is my understanding that IMCL approached the deal by stating they didn't	Arthur Radley	-	2/8/2002
1972	There are $200M given in cash to the company that imcl is still holding on to. S	Cacaito	-	2/8/2002
1971	What is interesting in this whole mess is the fact that BMY bought their 20% sta	Arthur Radley	-	2/8/2002
1970	Td, BMY will win, made no mistake about it !!! P Dolan has a strong case, espec	Cacaito	-	2/8/2002
1969	No opinion, either way. No facts at hand! Just joining in the braying, even at	keokalani'nui	-	2/8/2002
1968	Open question, if BMY wins is that not bad for IMCL stock? If IMCL loses and ac	aknahow	-	2/8/2002
1967	If I were imcl I would say if that is how you feel, thanks for the anticipatory	keokalani'nui	-	2/8/2002
1966	BMY not starting to play hardball...about time! biz.yahoo.com	Arthur Radley	-	2/7/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):