SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19907Thanks, appreciate the info.Bridge Player-8/26/2002
19906You need to answer responsively, Bill. "Unesponsiveness" was one of thE-8/26/2002
19905That post is bizarre. This was not about "disagreement." It was about E-8/26/2002
19904You're out of control today. Need to get some help.Bill-8/26/2002
19903Anything you disagree with is disgusting, right? Of course, it appears you do noBill-8/26/2002
19902That doesn't surprise me a bit. DNA is getting innocent people released froE-8/26/2002
19901You wrote the post. I ignored it. You then posted a series of links of postsE-8/26/2002
19900<i>You dig up a post of mine from three weeks ago as if it was a leech stuOriginal Mad Dog-8/26/2002
19899<i>The military coalition consisted of: Afghanistan, Argentina, AustraliaOriginal Mad Dog-8/26/2002
19898Where do you get off talking about logic? Or ethics? You can't even have a rBill-8/26/2002
19897<< In the 1991 Gulf War, the United States led a coalition of about 40 couBridge Player-8/26/2002
19896You're enough of one to do me for the day, thank you. Take a course in logiE-8/26/2002
19895I propose that SMBR institute the death penalty. 12 jurors should be impaneled Original Mad Dog-8/26/2002
19894Take a pill.Bill-8/26/2002
19893I reasonably debated. I've done it for years, here. You did not. You merely E-8/26/2002
19892<b>Confession Had His Signature; DNA Did Not</b> nytimes.com [ someWin Smith-8/26/2002
19891Cut the crap, E. If you cannot reasonably debate the topic without some emotionaBill-8/26/2002
19890That is a disgustingly dishonest post.E-8/26/2002
19889It's all about choices. I stand by my statement. <I>The liberal positiBill-8/26/2002
19888I'll read his posts with more attention (and curiosity) from now on.E-8/26/2002
19887That's a brilliant piece. This is wonderfully expressed: "To think thatE-8/26/2002
19886<i>In addition to that general conclusion, Rummel asserts that several keyaverage joe-8/26/2002
19885<i>Soon to be (oj </i> Just so you don't become a @0-( E-8/26/2002
19884We the People, We the Warriors By Talbot Brewer Monday, August 26, 2002; Page ALane3-8/26/2002
19883<i>So should only vets be allowed to be President?</i> I think thatLane3-8/26/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News