SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20057<i>"is sick to death"</i> That is your penalty for involone_less-8/26/2002
20056<i>"Should it be illegal?"</i> Now on this separate issueone_less-8/26/2002
20055<i>And you're just a little sneak of a rabble rouser.</i> I seeLane3-8/26/2002
20054foul. We were talking about using language to cause personal harm or damages toone_less-8/26/2002
20053Absolutely not. It is basic to our freedoms to allow idiots to burn the flag if Bridge Player-8/26/2002
20052Let's take a simple, highly inflamatory (literally!) instance: flag burningLazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20051I noticed.....I can wait....one_less-8/26/2002
20050In the world of double negatives this leaves the other guy with a clear target.one_less-8/26/2002
20049I have not yet begun to fight. :-)Lazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20048I thought your best shot was already spent?one_less-8/26/2002
20047You know, you can just make your point and walk away from a fight. It works. ILazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20046They stand as much chance of doing that as the TP motion did. I'd oppose itLazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20045They will eventually run out of steam. I think. Let's pop up some other suLazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20044Some people don't take hints fer s**t!Lazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20043And you're just a little sneak of a rabble rouser. We all have our crosses tBill-8/26/2002
20042<I>If you and E want to kick me off the thread, go ahead and get it going.Lane3-8/26/2002
20041Good point.Bill-8/26/2002
20040<i>I started browsing and posting here a week or so ago and thought this wLane3-8/26/2002
20039Of course it's the subject. You are a sniper and you make things up, just liE-8/26/2002
20038%-6 one participant %') the other :-/ :-)Lazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20037<i>Yes, and guess what? IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT'S FAULT!!</i> ILane3-8/26/2002
20036That's not the subject at all. Bill has already said several times that he sBill-8/26/2002
20035The "dog" slot on the thread is already occupied by OMD. We don'tLazarus_Long-8/26/2002
20034Bull. The issue is about which of two adults, both acting like children squabbliBridge Player-8/26/2002
20033I think this would be a most excellent day for one. <b>ROTFLMAO</b>Lazarus_Long-8/26/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News