SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20901RESEARCH ALERT-No bankruptcy concerns at Lucent LU has $1.7 billion in cash. LucJesica Dawnet-10/5/2002
20900Well the intraday high/low has narrowed....0.79/0.73....where the high has gone Anonymous-10/4/2002
20899I don't think you know what you are talking about. I'm not even getting David Hansen-10/2/2002
20898BWAC, RE: <i> $5 would also be equal to CSCO's cash in the bank.<GVTucker-10/2/2002
20897Evey bit higher then 0 counts!Dolfan-10/2/2002
20896<i>Brief 10% blip up this morning </i> Right. So instead of being Elroy-10/2/2002
20895$5 would also be equal to CSCO's cash in the bank. So you are saying it shouBWAC-10/2/2002
20894Brief 10% blip up this morning while NT and CSCO in the tank. May settle in a trDavid Hansen-10/2/2002
20893<i>I have seen other company stocks with financials that are worse</i&gElroy-10/2/2002
20892Considering my own comments, I have decided to buy a small quantity of shares inJesica Dawnet-10/1/2002
20891I agree on the reverse split. I'd rather see LU avoid having to do one. Espesylvester80-10/1/2002
20890Conversent Communications Selects Lucent Technologies to Help Expand Multi-serviDavid Hansen-10/1/2002
20889Frightening! I remember buying JDSU at around $6 and LU at around $5 thinking tPatricia Meaney-10/1/2002
20888I'd agree on NT, but not sure of LU. There is so much corporate damage and Kevin Rose-10/1/2002
20887Been watching the following stocks since March 23, 2000, a day I picked since itAnonymous-10/1/2002
20886And considering how bad things really are, it would also be a folly to think it sylvester80-9/30/2002
20885The problem is that I think that both LU and NT will NOT be ALLOWED to go bankrusylvester80-9/30/2002
20884Jesica, my point is that you are wrong about how a stock trades after the reversDiB-9/30/2002
20883Jesica, RE: <i> That is assuming that they do this bad, which they WILL GVTucker-9/30/2002
20882If you are a LU bull, you may be emotionally attached to the stock. To test thiKevin Rose-9/30/2002
20881Also; What if the stock goes above $1 within 15 days, have you planned what to Jesica Dawnet-9/30/2002
20880LU is clearly NOT a candidate for bankruptcy. If you really thought this, then yJesica Dawnet-9/30/2002
20879Agreed. Reverse splits do nothing but move a decimal point. The fact that there David Hansen-9/30/2002
20878<i>what was the Senator who said a billion here, and a billion there, an sDavid C. Burns-9/30/2002
20877Jesica, <i>It will NOT go below a dollar, and most likely will go UP. HoweDiB-9/30/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News