Shorting stocks: Broken stocks - Analysis

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Shorting stocks: Broken stocks - Analysis

An SI Board Since May 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2506	81	0

Emcee: Q.	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2106	vol, here's one of the posts with backtesting results for the low RS / neg	Q.	-	2/22/1999
2105	i looked but must have missed your backtest posts. can you give me a link? vo	Vol	-	2/22/1999
2104	Volunteer, yes, it has been backtested. I've posted results on it quite a f	Q.	-	2/21/1999
2103	John G, appreciate your short screen. How did you come up with it and, most im	Vol	-	2/21/1999
2102	Agreed, Dale, that biotech and pharmaceutical stocks in the development stage a	Q.	-	2/21/1999
2101	I can never calculate the risk in shorting these biopharmaceutical companies.	Dale Baker	-	2/20/1999
2100	HEB, the biopharmaceutical development stage co that is one of the Asensio targ	Q.	-	2/19/1999
2099	URGENT: FNHC is being touted all over SI and Yahoo after huge volume on Friday.	Dale Baker	-	2/16/1999
2098	On a nostalgic note, the final chapter in one of the true discount convertible	Dale Baker	-	2/14/1999
2097	Thank you for doing that research. In bear times that may become an interesting	RockyBalboa	-	2/13/1999
2096	Here are the stocks for the Feb. 99 low RS / neg cash flow screen. I did this s	Q.	-	2/13/1999
2095	Thanks-I have read and studied the SEC filing.Yes,I agree with you that unless	telephonics	-	2/13/1999
2094	If anyone is wondering why the OCOM private placement involved 1,140,000 "	Rajiv	-	2/12/1999
2093	Rajiv, re. OCOM, I agree that the strange nature of using shares rather than wa	Q.	-	2/12/1999
2092	I had assumed that the private placement will have the following effect on the	Rajiv	-	2/11/1999
2091	re. <<The promissory notes with a principal amount of 2.85 million is a l	Q.	-	2/11/1999
2090	The promissory notes with a principal amount of 2.85 million is a liability...	Rajiv	-	2/11/1999
2089	re. OCOM's net tangible assets, to me it looks like it was $2.5 M as of 9/9	Q.	-	2/11/1999
2088	Timeframe and the ratio has not yet been decided. Edit - The announcement to	Rajiv	-	2/11/1999
2087	OCOM sells two vidphone systems! Look out! Thursday February 11, 6:03 am East	Peter V	-	2/11/1999
2086	Great news about OCOM. I covered at 3 1/2 for a nice profit some time ago, but	Peter V	-	2/11/1999
2085	Rajiv, I covered OCOM in late December because of the upcoming january effect,	Q.	-	2/11/1999
2084	If OCOM has dropped off your radar screen, it is time to put it back. OCOM has	Rajiv	-	2/11/1999
2083	Dale, re. PRVT, I only spent 60 seconds looking at the filing, but it seemed th	Q.	-	1/31/1999
2082	I'm looking for opinions on PRVT which will start trading on the NASDAQ on	Dale Baker	-	1/31/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):