SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion
An SI Board Since January 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
286 12 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
211The abortion issue is a an existential delima. Pure and simple. There is no righkoan-5/20/2009
210<I> Tim, we all SEE that you don't think there is evidence of hate atTimF-5/20/2009
209<Note, no mention of "hate groups" > LOL... no just 'groupsLLCF-5/20/2009
208Yes that's the non-evidence. Note, no mention of "hate groups" TimF-5/20/2009
207Riiiiight... so to sum up for those who may have originally bothered to follow TLLCF-5/20/2009
206<I> You didn't say that... you said: <<"Direct quote"TimF-5/20/2009
205<Both my initial and my current position is that someone quoting someone elseLLCF-5/19/2009
204<I> And 'straw man' is a nice phrase, but NO WHERE did I misrepresTimF-5/19/2009
203<Disagreeing with the straw man ideas you presented as mine in order to attacLLCF-5/19/2009
202 I haven't backpedaled out of anything. Disagreeing with the straw man ideTimF-5/19/2009
201More fallout from Church's stance on birth control: <<Carla Bruni hasLLCF-5/19/2009
200Well, you've back peddled out of almost the whole thing... let's continuLLCF-5/19/2009
199<I> and you have given up on the idea that the reporter made the whole thiTimF-5/19/2009
198You're just being silly... although it seems you have now researched the piLLCF-5/19/2009
197<I> Right...since YOU would do such means the columnist would too, right? TimF-5/19/2009
196<"Direct quote", doesn't mean much in the way of evidence. I caLLCF-5/19/2009
195<I> Ummm, Tim... seeing someone "snarling with hatred" is evidenTimF-5/19/2009
194In case you missed it: washingtonpost.com IMHO, it was actually a great day foLLCF-5/19/2009
193<"Snarl of Hatred" even if true would be evidence of nothing. "LLCF-5/19/2009
192 I read both, neither showed any evidence of your accusation. "Snarl ofTimF-5/19/2009
191<but you do nothing to back up the accusation.> Ummmm, not to be rude... LLCF-5/19/2009
190<I> And.. is there a point?? </i> That's what I'm wonderTimF-5/18/2009
189<I notice that the article (or at least your quote of it) doesn't mentionLLCF-5/18/2009
188 I notice that the article (or at least your quote of it) doesn't mention aTimF-5/18/2009
187I wonder if Obama's speech included a bit of a 'jab'? In any case, LLCF35/18/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News